It's pronounced "nookular".
And Doom went to my little league games!
damn, no mod points...+1 Insightful and +5 Funny. You have to know Quebec language laws to get this. Unfortunately, some might mark it Troll/Flamebait
It's more likely that google is just more open and honest about how they use the information they have about you. They admit openly that the main reason for their success is their "marketing" ability. Customer/client information is a valuable commodity, and the marketers at any corporation you deal with would be fools to not monetize the information they manage to collect.
This is the same reason facebook pisses me off with their recent changes, but google+ doesn't really bother me.
I also suspect the newer UI APIs aren't fully implemented, so, perhaps... indeed only the old software actually works.
I know you are just guessing, but my counter-comment is: so they have caught up to the UI API from 10 years ago?
Why use 10 year old software to demo a "Windows replacement"? If a successful demo only works because it is old software, that somewhat speaks volumes.
This. A failed drive is a failed drive, regardless of who it comes from and whether the issue is known or not and publicly admitted.
Simple solution: real time (or updated hourly) traffic stats for the ISP backbone connection. Allow users unlimited use (unmetered) during the times when traffic is significantly less. As others have said, if the hardware is provisioned, then as long as it is not being taxed to the limit when you want to use it, then you shouldn't really be charged anything significant for using it.
Teksavvy does this on DSL in Canada.
Define useful...I don't think that word means what you think it means.
And yet, the single most basic thing you can do to protect your data gets overlooked by hundreds of millions of people, because it's just too burdensome to drag and drop from "My documents" to "My external drive".
And how many people that do use an external drive actually unplug it after the fact?
400000000 PPM should have said 400000000 PPT
0.18 PPT vs 400 PPM
0.18 PPT vs 400000000 PPM
0.00000018 PPM vs 400 PPM
One of them is deceptive, the other 2 provide proper context. Even being 7000 times more powerful doesn't make up for 6 orders of magnitude in concentration.
I fail to see why the insurance company would care, and if they did care what legal theory they would use to deny the claim.
Simple: you broke the law. Therefore, the insurance company doesn't have to pay out. Most policies say they are null and void if the vehicle is involved in any illegal activity.
except that you would also block other Environmental microwave and RF thereby impacting the result.