Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

Comment: Re:Biometrics is a dead-end (Score 4, Interesting) 110 110

by teidou (#43318009) Attached to: Why Your Next Phone Will Include Biometric Security
Yep, that's a serious issue.

There is a difference between identity and authentication, and that difference is lost when one uses biometric identity measures for authentication.

Great writeup on this from 2006 over at MSDN

Short version: identify and authentication must remain distinct if you want to have a system where users are held responsible for their actions.

Comment: Joker? (Score 1) 143 143

by teidou (#36049232) Attached to: Scientists Afflict Computers With Schizophrenia
Sometimes I wonder how people develop their hypotheses. In this case, I'm wonder whether one of the researchers may have been struck by Morrison's Joker in the Batman Comic Arkham Asylum - in which a researcher describes the joker as hyper-sane, unable to filter out stimulus from the world around. Hmm.

Comment: Re:The damage is already done (Score 1) 813 813

by teidou (#34783024) Attached to: Famous British Autism Study an 'Elaborate Fraud'
Thanks. I was unaware of the Provenge issue, and it is certainly uncomfortable. This is exactly the kind of issue the FDA struggles with - attempting to provide clear, specific evidence that a drug is safe and effective. In the face of public pressure. Their standards for approval are fairly high.

Since this IS Slashdot, I'll ask a couple of questions: Your language is fairly judgmental - you seem convinced "the FDA" was out to hurt people. On purpose. Since that's quite a claim, can you help me out a bit here: the FDA advisory panel voted 13-4 in favor of approval. When you say "contrary to any and all expert opinion", are you excluding the 4 that voted no when using the word "all"? Or was that a bit of exaggeration?

Also, I've read several pages from the Google results and am still unclear. What is the evidence that it "maliciously held back" the drug?

Comment: Re:The damage is already done (Score 1) 813 813

by teidou (#34778502) Attached to: Famous British Autism Study an 'Elaborate Fraud'

Typically, as long as you have 85% or so vaccinated

Uhm, you're numbers are off a bit. At least for measles, it takes more like 95% (see Unless you have better, peer-reviewed data?

As long as most people are vaccinated you aren't likely to contract the disease, but if you are vaccinated it puts you at risk for side effects.

Also, CDC reported several hundred vaccine reported deaths in the last 10 years. I personally would rather my child have a small risk of allergic reaction or a mild illness than die. Particularly if the mild illness is part of keeping the group as a whole well, but the death my own fault.

"Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there." -- Will Rogers