Comment Technology will be used for good or ill (Score 2) 19
Trying to create a technology without a dark side is a fools errand. Any tool, no matter how well built or well intended can and will be used for evil. This is just human nature.
Trying to create a technology without a dark side is a fools errand. Any tool, no matter how well built or well intended can and will be used for evil. This is just human nature.
It is possible to squeeze out a lot of efficiency without resorting to this level of optimization. Just rethinking how much CPU your code uses can save a lot. Rework your code to efficient. It will get faster as a result. Do this at every level from compiler development on up.
Learning to code tightly is a difficult task. Maybe bring back some coding for machines like the Commodore 64. I remember reworking code just to save 4 bytes. I need just that much more space for the program to run. We don't need to get that detailed but even jut cutting the cruft out will really bring results.
Exactly. The Japanese Space Program (JAXA) has been working to solve this issue. Their wood based satellite frame is amazing. The durability test on orbit is the last hurdle (and that is in process now). Personally I can't wait to see the results.
Is satellite disposal a problem? It is. But there is a better way to solve the issue than eliminate capabilities or mandating further studies. Change materials. Today, most satellites use aluminum, steel, tungsten, and other exotic metals. Stop building with them. Instead use carbon fiber structures, other composites, copper, etc. It requires a shift in thinking away from just the mission an into a total lifecycle process.
It helps to think smaller too. Satellites don't need to be as massive as they are today. Smaller is better. Focus more on CubeSats as opposed to school bus sized spacecraft.
There was a very interesting movie from the 80s called "Looker" starring Albert Finney that had the exact same plot.
Why don't we just move the clocks forward 30 minutes in March 2025 and never touch this issue again?
Having worked in water infrastructure for several years, I wholeheartedly agree. Old computers, old software, and weak security are rampant. Combine that with underfunded municipalities and you get a recipe for easy disruption - and not in a good way.
Sounds like this CEO is still used to the old school way of thinking. My wife managed global teams for a major corporation for over 10 years. All from home. I think she might have met with some of her teammates every year or so, but not everyone could attend at that was fine. She continually increased the efficiency of these teams - all without stepping foot at any company facility.
Remote management is completely possible. It takes time to build the tools and keep to the work ethic needed, but with upper management's blessing and understanding, it can be quite profitable for the company as well.
Maybe Arvind Krishna should get out of the office and learn how it is really done instead of relying on reports.
That’s a good one! Bill Weber is the current CEO. Tom stepped aside after the last round of funding.
If that ship has a name, it might be considered for a future launch.
I really enjoyed Star Trek: Strange New Worlds. It was great. Like older Trek shows. I have also been an avid fan of For All Mankind. That is a great show.
SpaceX keeps racking up the wins. This one was special though as I have my first free flying orbital satellite in space because of this flight.
Sorry (not sorry) for the shameless plug.
Training would have prevented this whole thing from exploding. Keeping critical infrastructure off the internet would have prevented this. What the hell is is Teamviewer doing on a system that is linked to their SCADA? Air Gap anyone?
Having worked in water quality for a few years, I am surprised they had a system as sophisticated as Windows 7. A lot of the smaller wastewater plants were still running Windows XP and even DOS to connect to their SCADA and PLC systems. Security is considered a big hassle as it takes a lot of training. Upgrades costs money that most municipalities simply do not have. When there is no budget, things don't get done, or done with a patchwork of parts. It is sad to see. I am not advocating throwing money at the problem, but municipalities need to come to terms with the shortchanging they have done at a lot of these facilities.
Many people are unenthusiastic about their work.