Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

Comment: There are also studies (Score -1) 111 111

That show antidepressants make rats less competitive, compared to rats that don't receive the drugs. The drugged rats mate less and at a delayed rate, and score less food. This highlights the drugs negative side effects of sabotaging performance, skill, and judgment.

For what we know, those on celexa were not as competitive, didn't care as much about money, and perhaps didn't even have coherent underlining thought processes despite the fact that they still made a decision that seems to correlate with how they might be expected to feel anyway.

obamasweapon.com

Comment: this guy is gaming the system (Score -1) 196 196

in recent interviews he has acted like public reforms have been made, but in fact no reforms have been made. it's like he's just trying to game the public in order of hopes of coming back to the United States one day. he is not coming off as trust worthy, and seems to be spouting pro-government propaganda to save himself from further irritating the government.

don't trust a word this queer says.

I know the system has not been reformed, and that surveillance continues on as aggressively as before, even whistleblowers like Dr. Robert Duncan and NSA whistleblower William Binney back that up. Binney has went on the record in fact, pointing out that collection of telephone metadata and phone calls content remains under upstream fiber taps, even though technically the program will be ending under Section 215 of the patriot act. the US Freedom Act in fact did nothing to end it either, it remains to be done under Executive Orders, Special Access Programs, and other "secret" programs Snowden is ignoring and hiding.

Snowden is a shill for going against the truth. Yes I am sure Snowden knows what he's doing too.

obamasweapon.com drrobertduncan.com

Today we continue to know there is no oversight, that Congress has not acted, that Congress has colluded with Snowden's team to cover up the issue of surveillance being an on going problem, and we know that until we have oversight of Apple and Congress, and the NSA and various agencies, nothing has changed and that everything they do is a show, a shell game, a psy op to fool and trick everyone. And I'm not even being conspiratorial, I have details from the inside on this, this continues on, nothing has improved at all.

Comment: Re:Knowledge (Score 0) 312 312

Remember Americans are targets for a reason and they seek to teach us a lesson for a reason. There are very good reasons to want to fight America and "Christians". This country is violent, its military, intelligence community, and leaders have committed mass crimes world wide.

When you consider this to be the reason we become the target constantly.. it is justified and obvious that we bring it on ourselves.

Most of the public has no idea what I am even talking about because the public is kept in the dark on what our government really does to stir up trouble.. even domestically, we have hurt hundreds of thousands of Americans in secret spy games.

drrobertduncan.com

Comment: yay we're being spied on illegally! (Score -1) 165 165

one court determined it was illegal. the white house says, "so what, fuck that court."

"we got our own court and they can do what they please."

In a way the 2nd Circuit's decision is regional, the way I understood the set up. Basically, the appeals courts in each circuit only control the law as they may through appeal decisions they will hand down, when a decision is made in a court in their territory.

In general, each circuit interprets the law differently. You have "District 1,2,3..,9 etc." And each one decides for themselves.

However, case law is barrowed from the other courts and may be agreed with or used to base similar decision in the other circuits.

US Supreme Court decisions unify the courts to their decision and overrule a local jurisdictions decisions.

BUT. There's another thing where a federal court with jurisdiction can order the federal government or anyone else to stop what it's doing and their decisions are in fact binding. If this has happened, then the FISA court should obey the other courts of the United States.

It should not be it's own little court that can just "do what ever the fuck it wants despite the case being settled by the other courts."

obamasweapon.com

Comment: Re:Clean room implementation? (Score -1) 223 223

I have ideas on why the courts are wrong on copyright.

One is, the US constitution spells out some limits. It says that copyrights are limited in duration. But it would seem that, if copyrights never expire during an author or inventors lifetime, let alone during the lifetime of anyone alive at the time of the copyright/patents granting, and extend 70+ years beyond his or her lifetime, that in fact Congress is violating the US constitution. the courts also err in determining that a corporation rather than the original author or inventor can own the copyright, or patent to something, such as a group/corporation of people who weren't the inventors or the author, because the language is used in the US constitution that the terms of any exclusive rights are limited to the author/inventors as a reward for contributing something to society that was new and beneficial. the intent of copyright/patents also were never intended to give someone exclusive rights to control something, but to merely reward for a time their work and contributions.

Now if the terms are for a "limited of time" like the US constitution says, then perhaps Congress in fact has no right to keep extending the time copyright and patents run for..

to define a limit, we must look at a persons lifetime. for something to be limited, people alive during the time of the copyright or patents creation must be able to see the copyright or patent expire. because obviously people in our history never intended for copyright and patents and exclusive rights to just exist forever. the worst part of it is, copyrights and patents are being used to strong arm OTHER peoples "freedom" to tell them, "no you may not copy our content, sell it, or obtain it without our permission" or "use something described in our invention patent even though you are clearly capable of duplicating and making the process work yourself (preventing advancement of society, price drops, and competition/new technologies from emerging)."

another thing to pick at.. if originally there were limits, then the law is sort of like a contract with people. that said, "after so much time, this persons copyrighted material will be yours to use for free." Basically the public should own all content as Congress originally agreed to, it would basically be owned by the "public domain." Does Congress really have the right to go in and reclaim that content and give it back to the copyright holder indefinitely after law already set to make the public the owner? That's like, total theft from the public domain and a total restriction on peoples freedoms, restraining the public from using content "created" by others for an indefinite period of time which just isn't right.

Yes I take issue with that because I feel government should have no say in what I as a citizen can do with material or content I come across. It's like a freedom of expression, and liberty, to do what I want in the world without someone else telling me "no." or trying to put me in prison and taking all my money or something. :)

obamasweapon.com

Comment: drones hard to detect (Score -1) 227 227

because all the best detection technology is classified, and in the hands of the government only.

radar systems work the best and masint systems. satellites and over the horizon radar. sigint also. they can track all signals through the airwaves and monitor moving objects and detect characteristics about them.

trust me drones are secretly fully detectable and being watched.

so are people.

obamasweapon.com

Comment: an argument for patent trolls (Score 0) 87 87

patent trolls to this day mostly impact large companies who are patent trolls themselves.

so when some competition arises it's patent troll versus patent troll, trolls set the system up, and I'm giddy that the system the big boys enacted to live enslaved to has come to bite their ass back.

the general public shouldn't care less about the issue of patents other than hoping the whole system explodes and patents, copyright, and trademark protections are abolished completely, serving little interest to the public in general who do not benefit from or utilize such methods to control others.

those methods are used to control the general public only. :)

obamasweapon.com

Comment: is this true (Score -1) 1094 1094

because countries like Denmark's minimum wage is $22 an hour, even at Burger King.

so I don't believe this shit that, "companies" are going to fold.

I think that's a farce story being seeded by republicans and rich fuckers / wage enslavers.

they want us to think, the money going to individuals versus to corporations and investors is going to lead to businesses that cannot sustain themselves. but it's simply not true, the money simply diverts from some rich chumps bank account and ends up in the streets circulated to everyone else instead.

and we've looked at things like costs of items and whatnot, they're about the same.

ie, big mac in Australia costs less than the Big Macs in American yet the minimum wage and benefits are significantly worse in America, meaning they aren't paying their employees nearly the same.

this is because, every dollar a corporation saves, and every extra dollar they take in, goes to the corporation and rich investors instead of the employees and society who need it.

cut funding from social security, food stamps, health care, wages, or increase cost to take more from people's resources, all it does is go into the bank of some rich bitch to hoard and never see the light of day again.

the reason: money in the bank creates class separation, so poor become poorer and rich become richer, and rich get what they need in abundance while the poor get nothing. no education, no housing, no health care, excessively overworked, nada. money equates to power politically, whoever has money is on top and whoever doesn't have money is on the bottom enslaved to who does have it. so there's a huge incentive to keep money and prevent others from getting it, the same as they like to buy all the senate and congressional seats to control the laws that re-enforce their power letting them dominate the entire planet in safety with militaries and police there to back and protect them. ;)

obamasweapon.com

Comment: Alamogordo, New Mexico: Our trash, your treasure. (Score -1) 107 107

Looks like something from the sewer someone is trying to sell on eBay for $150-$250 dollars a pop! Basically chunks of fucking trash that was buried underneath and next to other trash all of it decomposing for 30 years!

http://www.obamasweapon.com/

This may have been worth something if the carts were buried inside sealed containers, but it appears the carts were seriously damaged by the environment they were in..

1. Locate and dig up 30 year old decomposing trash surrounded by all sorts of other trash.
2. Put on eBay.
3. ???
4. Profit!

Comment: Alamogordo, New Mexico: Our trash, your treasure. (Score -1) 107 107

Looks like something from the sewer someone is trying to sell on eBay for $150-$250 dollars a pop, for a piece of fucking trash that was buried underneath and next to other trash all of it decomposing for 30 years!

http://www.obamasweapon.com/

This may have been worth something if the carts were buried inside sealed containers, but it appears the carts were seriously damaged by the environment they were in..

1. Dig up 30 year old decomposing trash.
2. Put on eBay.
3. ???
4. Profit out the ass off of trash!

Comment: Re:Submitter addicted to technologies (Score -1) 291 291

first of all, you have access to a 100Mbps/100Mbps. no one else in America does. the connections average 12Mbps down. the upload is significantly less.

connections could average 10Gbps/10Gbps w/ no bottleneck. but the lack of a system like this, which would make nearly all transfers instantaneous and w/o delay or latency increases, means we will continue to sit for hours transferring large files, and being unable to back up our entire systems in seconds to internet connected machines, etc.

there is also no hosting at home today because home connections suck. my personal website for example sucks up 90Mbps average, and I only get 400 visits a day. I could be hosting this at home on my own fiber connections, instead I am near the limit I might get kicked off my shared plan - and there is nothing better unless I spent $200 for a dedicated server. Fiber at home for $70, or $200 for a retarded dedicated server located in someones rack somewhere? hmm..

Comment: Re:All the movies had women in business (Score -1) 786 786

What goes on is that media ultimately shapes and programs people into certain molds. They learn stereotypes, behaviors, dislikes, and appropriateness, by mimicking what they see and having their brain stimulated by what they come into contact with. So if they were exposed to things that made them feel like the whole realm was meant for boys, and if everyone felt that was "right" when they actually came into contact with it (basically if peoples brains actually were already programmed to listen to the massly broadcasted mind control messages fed by media, corporations, and blah, blah), they would basically believe that and fall into the molds.

Now schools and stuff play a roll, too. So if in early childhood, and early life experiences, there gender differences were programmed, each person would naturally in their own mind tend to follow the paths that were seemingly appropriate, laid out for them, and all that. What's worse is each person would physically follow this and believe it, and continue the pattern and practice of discussing, feeling, and seeing the world through these narrow means, because they themselves had been programmed to think and follow and know only that. The way the brain works of course, are the ideas, conceptions, things people see, hear, all that, images and sound broadcast into the mind through TV and radio, stereotyping or even just joking and satire, all this shapes the mind because stimulation like this makes those brain regions more dominant, it basically molds their personality and perceptions and behaviors, no one can actually escape it. This is why seeding healthy messages early is important, but in a capitalistic society where things are only done for profit rather than for best outcome, this isn't happening. Also military and government like us to be retarded, there are ties to early mind control tactics developed by the CIA, Disney, and others, that essentially help to control society and make it more profitable and more of what it is today. Meaning, the flaws we have, those are all by design, it's deliberate, they created it all entirely..

What we have today is a society, people, and system, set up to make us follow our leaders, and that includes gender rolls and other shit, making the girls girls, boys boys, and all sorts of other problems (The CIA/Military also likes a more aggressive crop of people, it's that sophisticated, they are doing this..)...

They also love people to be thrown off, manageable, and chasing the white rabbit their whole lives, never able to get the big picture, avoiding any sort of ricing up / independent thinking that might lead to disobedience.. (think back to the Cypher character in The Matrix movie. See how he'd rather have a nice juicy steak, than to have his freedom? Typical American, unwilling to go against anything wrong, including the man that might cut off his paycheck and access to a steak. The American government also set up a distribution network of steak, to keep the supply coming, for those who accept the program.) :D

http://www.obamasweapon.com/..

Comment: Re:to clarify what this means. (Score -1) 134 134

remember w/ McKayla Maroney, she claims the pictures were faked though. if truly faked, there is no claim for prosecution, and she has no claim for damages.. :)

and I doubt the original model if faked will be identified unless they come forward to make a claim.

fakes = legal so. it really only matters the age of the actual models/flesh used.

Comment: this is a jokeh (Score -1) 134 134

you don't have to follow DMCA if you don't want. basically there are things that weren't copyright violations under the old system before DMCA, and in that case if it was legal before it's legal now. this includes fair use of material, transformative and educational works.

with the DMCA system, anyone can submit a take down notice, claiming to be the copyright owner, and in my experience on YouTube and Facebook, this leads to mistakes and content that is knocked offline simply because someone else states a claim to ownership, even fake owners. Someone did this to Neowin's Facebook page, knocking it offline when Facebook refused to acknowledge who the true owner of the name Neowin was. plenty of content is forced offline from YouTube simply because "in the background" someone is playing a copyrighted song.

if DCMA was honored 100%, technically all material is copyright owned that is not in the public domain. this includes clip art, graphics, logos, jpegs, gifs, audio, movie clips, pictures of other peoples copyrighted works, etc.

a site like 4chan if copyright was 100% enforced thus could not exist. because almost all the content is someone's copyright or trademark. pictures of animal characters for example, movie clips, even the art of someone else that they post is copyrighted..

with DCMA there is a system in place of no due process, so technically they don't even have to prove ownership in court to force 4chan to comply with take downs. It will be hard for 4chan to weed out who is a fake or legit filing of DCMA take down notices, and it opens the system up to both abuses from people who want to sabotage this type of site & finally over aggressive filing of legit complaints that seem absurd but are actually allowed under the DCMA.

DCMA enables full censorship of a site like 4chan, and thus the internet community, all with no due process or court oversight.. They don't even have to prove damages before requiring content to be taken offline with that law.. Rip 4chan if someone decides to take advantage of any of this. ;)

http://www.obamasweapon.com/

Experiments must be reproducible; they should all fail in the same way.

Working...