Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:Can't they technically fork it? (Score 2) 344

by stepheneb (#33403258) Attached to: Google Backs Out of JavaOne

In summary, open source Java is fine, open source almost-Java is not.

If you make a derivation/fork with the open source Java code Oracle only extends patent grants if your fork passes Oracle's expensive certification tests for Java. This certification is impractical for most people or organizations and is inherently impossible for anybody who is interested in making a new language with the code or adapting some of the code for other purposes.

In summary:

  • an alternative open source Java is quite difficult because the of the costs of certification
  • use the open source Java codebase for anything else and Oracle can sue you for patent violations
  • contributing to Oracle's existing OpenJDK codebase is fine

What this country needs is a dime that will buy a good five-cent bagel.

Working...