Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Of course they don't need the full spectrum (Score 1) 79

by spleck (#47891731) Attached to: L.A. TV Stations Free Up Some Spectrum For Wireless Broadband

I was talking with someone who gave additional reason to cut cord from Comcast is HD from OTA is far superior than on cable which is highly compressed to transmit all those channels down the coax.

I long suspected Cox cable re-compressed our local stations, but then found out all the stations are sharing 2 HD stations per transmitter, some with an extra SD subchannel. So even over the air, all my locals are less than 9 Mbps. Cox has the dirty work done for them already, and just sends out the same signal.

Comment: Quality Loss Depends (Score 1) 79

by spleck (#47891611) Attached to: L.A. TV Stations Free Up Some Spectrum For Wireless Broadband

In my area, many of our OTA network stations share a channel (due to financial issues, not to free up spectrum). Fox/ABC, CBS/CW, NBC/myTV.

I think most programs have no issues with 12+ Mbps, which usually leaves room for a SD sub-channel. However, shoving two HD programs into a 6 MHz channel leaves each ~9 Mbps. Sports programs suffer significant blocking and pixelation on fast action and pans. Live shows such as America's Got Talent also block and pixelate. Studio shows fare better.

I believe the problem may vary based on market since, I assume, the broadcasts are re-compressed locally and we're at the mercy of the capability of whatever system my money-starved stations purchased. NBC and CBS are the worst here, and I'm not sure if it's their choice of compression hardware or just that 1080i suffers more than 720p.

So basically on these shared channels, you suffer from limited bandwidth, re-compression artifacts (going form 12-18 Mbps down to 9), and local hardware limitations (poor quality compressor, no pre-processing/single-pass only, etc).

Comment: Re:Hormone therapy? (Score 1) 784

by spleck (#44645553) Attached to: Bradley Manning Wants To Live As a Woman

To be fair, the US prisons on that list were elaborate clean facilities, unlike most of the rest. One made the list for "brutal" guards, and the other for being so secure the prisoners want to kill themselves. Sounds like a different level of "bad" than rampant AIDS outbreaks or occasional massacres of the entire population.

Comment: Stop getting junk mail (Score 1) 582

by spleck (#42811567) Attached to: US Postal Service Discontinuing Saturday Mail Delivery

A lot of people are using this as an excuse to complain about all the junk mail they get. Why don't you do something about it? Cancel all the catalogs and crap you're getting.

Start here: http://www.optoutprescreen.com/

If you get stuff with pre-paid return envelopes, send back a note asking to be removed from their mailing list.

Comment: Re:They include an adaptor for the EU (Score 3, Insightful) 543

by spleck (#41341095) Attached to: iPhone 5 Scorns Standards Promise To European Commission

If the EU had standardized on a free (no royalties) Lightning connector, everyone would be crying foul over government mandates and how it stifles innovation.

The goal was to get rid of large power bricks attached to proprietary connectors. Apple has for MANY years supplied a power plug with a standard USB connector and used the same cable/connector for 10 years. THAT has reduced waste. What other phone manufacturer has stuck with their plugs that long? How many phones will charge from a 10 year old cable?

What about all those phones that include a micro-USB port for charging, but then have ANOTHER port or a ANOTHER special proprietary cable to get audio/video out?

Comment: Re:On record that AT&T is exclusive until 2012 (Score 1) 251

by spleck (#32740126) Attached to: Verizon iPhone Rumored For Early Next Year

Read the original Engadget post and the court documents are weaselly. They are simply saying that customers should not expect phone unlocks because USA Today made it public knowledge that there was a 5 year contract. They did NOT reveal the actual contract as part of the court documents, nor did they go on record confirming the contract. USA Today never said the contract started in 2007, that's just when they reported it. Lot's of assumptions being made.

New systems generate new problems.

Working...