Of which KDE, GNOME2 & XFCE are not tablet i/f's, while GNOME3 is. What's your point?
Simple, no one is forcing any Linux user to use a table interface shoehorned into a desktop interface, there's choice aplenty. I shouldn't have included Gnome 3.
Duh, battery life is almost exclusively charge/discharge cycles, so the office building is putting very significant costs onto the car owners.
Anyway: supercomputers: Linux, embedded: Linux, servers: Linux, desktop: Windows, Mac, Linux...
Read the whole article, try to understand it, and then disagree with him or me....
I'm a denier because I'm right wing? I'm not actually, I typically vote Dutch Animal Party, and have even voted SP.
I wish this ridiculous antagonism would stop, I really do...
However, it's long been known from lots of modelling that the sun's influences are minute.
If you'd actually READ what Bas van Geel has found, measuring paleo-climate data, you'd probably be more skeptical of the modelling.
All IPCC consensus science works with GCM's that assume the only relevant solar variability is in TSI, and since the changes in TSI over time are very small, the models have to include large (ca. 6) amplification factors to map a link from CO2 to average planetary temperature.
The article shows that other mechanisms are active, and make it likely that the current GCM's are off.
Are you really so thick that you do not understand that labelling someone a 'denier' makes the angry !? Call me a skeptic, call me a maverick, call me an obstinate old fart, I don't care, but don't compare me with people that deliberately deny one of the most gruesome slaughters of all time.
So if you don't understand that using this specific label is offensive, then you are either very ignorant, or just an asshole.