I absolutely endorse your statements.
I refuse to vote for the 2 major parties.
Many tell me I'm "throwing away my vote", as those for whom I vote have no chance of winning.
And you know what? 99.9% of the time they're right! But
-> every now and then, change does happen
-> when the assholes in power notice that their winning margins are thinning, you better believe it grabs their attention
Here's what I have previously said on the subject.
Again, I absolutely agree with your stance.
Hey bud, you would have been better-off using this:
LastPass got a hold of the database and offers a checking service.
he did not lose his freedom of speech at all; freedom of speech != freedom from any and all ramifications.
So in your version of the USA, people can say whatever they like, and consequently be (fired | publicly shamed | arrested | executed) and you consider that freedom of speech?
I'd hate to think what you consider to be a LACK of freedom of speech! Cutting-out of tongue at birth?
There's no way the politicians will change the law so they can no longer get paid
They may fight us, but I refuse to roll-over and play dead.
I'm moderately active in trying to raise awareness of such practices:
- I contact politicians and express my dissatisfaction
- I contact advocacy groups / unions / etc and show my support
- I add comments on popular Australian newspaper forums, aiming to raise awareness and expose the hypocrisy and moral corruption of our politicians
(if nothing else, I can at least sow disdain with the current parties)
- I contact journalists and give them suggestions for stories that will also raise awareness of corrupt practices
- I share facts with family, friends and colleagues -- again, to sow disdain with the current setup (conscious not to become overbearing)
And I always make it clear that I loathe both major parties in Australia. It pains me when I see my fellow Australians blindly support one party and vilify the other: both parties are horrible! I believe we need to weaken the major parties (which necessarily means more smaller parties) so that they adjust their stance and truly serve the public.
In the future, I'm hoping to mobilise my neighbours into getting active and seeking to participate in our local (municipal) politics. So many local seats are so darn marginal, one only needs to influence a couple of hundred people to change the outcome.
Yes, I'm very hopeful (naive? deluded?) but I've made some waves, and will continue to.
Please don't lose hope. Become a thorn in their side!
For a power company there is absolutely no difference whether YOUR washing machine stops washing and they have to get rid of the 1kW that machine was draining OR YOUR solar plant suddenly increases its output by 1kW.
Dang, that's a great example.
I'm enjoying reading your responses; you're arming me with better arguments to counter those who irrationally favour protecting old energy giants instead of clean energy.
I'm happy to meet you half way:
I don't mind paying extra for 10 - 15 years or so, until we transition to a society where the average home doesn't even need to be connected to an electric utility.
As more homes disconnect, I expect utilities to raise the price of electricity, improving the ROI of alternative sources, accelerating the disconnection of residences.
So long as when the time comes, utilities don't try to prevent me from going off-grid. Or don't try to force a flat bill on me even if I don't use their service; just because they've got a few politicians in their pockets.
But I suspect that when that time comes they'll change their arguments. Because ultimately, these companies want to protect their profit margins, and renewal energy is a direct, and imminent, threat.
And / Or right-wing politicians are protecting their political donations from -- and future board-level seats with -- big energy companies.
not a word that Google thinks may be similar to the one I typed
Interpret instead as:
not a word that Google things may be similar to the one I typed
they need to try and think of another way of ending the conversation
That used to be me, when I was younger. However for several years now:
Salesperson: Hi sir. How are you today?
Me: No thanks. [While I continue walking, without pausing.]
We have plenty of people in Sydney CBD streets trying to hawk something.
Thankfully, I have never found them to be particularly aggressive / persistent.
e.g. dog tag
Woot, I just learned a new word: "intumescent"
*sob* I love
I must say I agree with everything you wrote
In Australia, I believe (IANAL) that we are legally required to give our name, address and D.O.B to police if apprehended. That's it. Only a judge can compel one to speak; and then it becomes a broader issue if one chooses to disobey a judge. If a judge asks for your TrueCrypt passphrase, it's hard to know what you'd do when faced with a couple of years imprisonment.
And I say the above as someone whose life is incredibly mundane (and very law abiding); yet I still believe in the right to privacy.
There is nothing wrong with a buyer preferring to get a factory locked down box if they so choose.
Yes, there is. Can you honestly not see the gradual slide towards loss of freedom?
Why not make it optional? That way, a technical person could get into the menu and disable it.
A non-technical person wouldn't even know this is possible, and leave it as default.
Problem solved, without imposing draconian measures on everyone!
There should be a permanent sh!tlist pinned to the top of Slashdot with any vendor that promotes this scheme for "PCs".
Yep, second this.
Given so many of us here on Slashdot are the go-to guys / gals for tech with our families and friends, we could certainly hit the manufacturer's where it hurts