This isn't proof as it is entirely anecdotal, but I have a lot of women friends who love hard math and absolutely hate practical programming problems, while the majority of my guy friends fall on the other side of that divide. That is only one possible explanation.
- You can't take it back if you were wrong
- It's too humane for monsters, when we have things like life without parole in solitary
However, if the debate is about a "humane" way to execute someone, why not inject them with the same drugs we use to knock someone out for surgery? No one debates the effectiveness of these drugs, they work, virtually every-time, hundreds of times a day for millions of people. The only bad side-effects are nausea and death, which aren't a problem in the execution process since the person isn't going to wake up anyway. Once they are out, you can dispose of them any way you like as they won't feel it.
"Civil rights groups dispute those figures and say other states have seen fewer African-American and Hispanic students attending highly competitive schools, especially in graduate level fields like law, medicine, and science."
I'm sure that is all about racism, and has absolutely NOTHING to do with whole "minority" thing, and there being less of them as a percentage of the population...
I see so you want the policy to be in place so that you can be outraged that it happened instead of preventing it from happening.
Nice slippery slope fallacy. You're 0 for 2. Care to try again?
Thanks for playing, next time try using your head...
If she were a Democrat, the article would talk about the racist/sexist Republicans that were trying to force her out.
The Democrats have only enhanced the spying and wiretapping, but you don't get outcry's about the likes of Facebook the Zuckerberg's of the world who are huge Democrat donors.
I love to see that "tolerance" the left is famous for.