Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Maybe not the only one (Score 1) 289

by shashark (#32947884) Attached to: IEEE Looks At Kevin Costner's Oil Cleanup Machines

Bullcrap. Read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Company

Quote "The Court held that a business corporation is organized primarily for the profit of the stockholders, as opposed to the community or its employees. The discretion of the directors is to be exercised in the choice of means to attain that end, and does not extend to the reduction of profits or the nondistribution of profits among stockholders in order to benefit the public, making the profits of the stockholders incidental thereto.
Because this company was in business for profit, Ford could not turn it into a charity. This was compared to a spoilation of the company's assets. The court therefore upheld the order of the trial court requiring that directors declare an extra dividend of $19 million."

This was in 1916, Mister.

Comment: It does work - first hand account (Score 5, Interesting) 219

by shashark (#32635556) Attached to: In NJ, Higher Tech Lowers Crime

So I lived in the mission area of SF for a while earlier this year. This place was bad - post the 21st street or so. A friend of mine was mugged & beaten badly at 24th and Mission (where Bart is) at 9 in the evening.

Last year they started installing cameras all around (very visible effort - you could see cameras all around you) - and the crime rate (atleast the mugging rate) went down immediately. Everyone here agrees that the drop in crime can be attributed to the street cameras. This opinion is also shared by business & hotel owners whom I know and meet.

I do think nothing can improve Tenderloin though.

There is nothing more silly than a silly laugh. -- Gaius Valerius Catullus

Working...