Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Accidental Complexity (Score 1) 411

by ryan.onsrc (#49032215) Attached to: Your Java Code Is Mostly Fluff, New Research Finds

This is old news folks.

Frederick P. Brooks Jr. wrote an excellent paper (No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering) back in 1987 (link: http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~cah/...) that highlights how so much of the complexity that exists in software is *accidental*. This problem is in no way specific to Java, but the language and the supporting eco-system of conventions, libraries and the various supporting "enterprise" tools certainly contribute to the situation. As a language that champions OOP (note: the paper calls out OOP specifically), it makes sense that Java's mainstream-status would lend itself towards being a poster-child for Accidental complexity.

Having worked in the software industry, on various Java code bases, for the past decade: I have observed this curious phenomenon first-hand, repeatedly. It really is quite unfortunate, as it is very possible to write elegant, and concise Java code: one simply has to adopt a more functional programming style and limit mutability within their code. The problem is: most Java developers who appreciate the value of functional programming and immutable design, have already moved on to other languages that have a syntax, standard library and an eco-system that is centered around these principles. I've moved on to Scala largely for this very reason: I grew tired of spending an hour frantically searching through a mountain of convoluted procedural code and XML configs: just to to see why a boolean flag I set was not "seen" by a particular class method.

Comment: Star Trek vs. The Prestige (Score 1) 163

by ryan.onsrc (#48881509) Attached to: Researchers Moot "Teleportation" Via Destructive 3D Printing

Somehow, I think transporters where Picard has to shoot his other self twice, after each away mission (first, when he returns back to the ship, and then secondly from orbit -- or only the later if he wants to be a lazy ass) would sorta ruin the whole utopian vibe.

Of course, there was that episode with two Rikers but at least things didn't turn out as violent as they did in The Prestige.

Comment: Computationally Speaking: This is garbage (Score 1) 513

by ryan.onsrc (#42839069) Attached to: MS Targets Google With Another Smear Campaign

computationally speaking, Microsoft's "Scroogled" Campaign it utter garbage.

Here's why (from a high-level technically stand-point):

Privacy is only truly violated when there exists some form of device IO of private information, in clear-text. For gmail to have code that performs in-memory comparisons of email text and advertisement content, to be considered a breach of privacy is complete crap. Yes, you can start nit-picking with issues such as whether buffers of data are not being left hanging around memory, or if gmail's method of requesting data from ad-servers can some how provide clues in logging files somewhere that could allow Googler #247 to infer that Johnny is sending emails about ant-farms. But, it all comes down to whether or not personal information is being written out somewhere for humans to read (whether indirectly or directly).

Having worked at software companies that jump through all kind of hoops to ensure that data is sanitized ad naseum: I highly doubt that Google is allowing their employees, let alone third-parties to freely spy on users.

Comment: Re:Too much for an online class. (Score 1) 177

by ryan.onsrc (#42525325) Attached to: UC's For-Pay Online Course Draws 4 Non-UC Students

... Especially for Pre-Calculus.

It's not until one takes Calculus that everything in Intermediate Algebra and Trigonometry all comes together, and actually makes sense. Now if $2,400 bought you a high-quality, well-taught series of online courses that cover Calculus I, II, Diff. Equations, Vector Calculus, and Linear Algebra --- *then* we're talking.

I can see paying as much as 3-4k for something like that.

Comment: Re:I say go ahead ... (Score 1) 342

by ryan.onsrc (#42184689) Attached to: Cops To Congress: We Need Logs of Americans' Text Messages

That's what I said until I got divorced and started dating again. Thousands of text messages. Yes, thousands. You don't tell a hot chick to switch to gtalk, just because it's free. Nope, you're better off being a man and spending that $10 a month for unlimited text without mentioning it. I'll never regret that choice.

You make a damn good point.

... though his invention worked superbly -- his theory was a crock of sewage from beginning to end. -- Vernor Vinge, "The Peace War"

Working...