Right, and the end result will be the union itself getting paid more than the workers it represents. Members of the union will either get nothing or just a few bucks, paid by the union itself from its collection reserve (if it even has one). Not many unions force a company to pay you even when work isn't available, where a down-size is required.

Well, the lack of tax-payer funding has resulted in a reduced teaching staff in cities across the US. A city might not be able to afford more teachers, but it can probably afford a bunch of sex.. I mean teaching bots to supplement tutoring.

Keep in mind that they sell several configurations, and you don't necessarily need the expensive full-bodied bot for teaching.

Ok, but their salaries are based on taxes that people need to vote for. Everyone always votes against increasing taxes for higher teacher salaries. The problem is that everyone is already taxed incredibly high at the federal level, and everybody always votes "no" to raise taxes at the local level where the direct benefits are seen the most. 33% of my income goes into taxes already, so yeah, I'm voting "no" every time.

I wouldn't exactly call them poverty wages either. I'm in Ohio and teachers make 60-70k a year after they get some experience in. It's not great but it's still a middle class income.

Every job posting on linkedin gets like a hundred job applications. Some technical jobs get hundreds in some cases. There are so many, that there is a problem with employers ghosting candidates as much as candidates are ghosting employers. Employers are even starting to have ridiculous application requirements to weed out people who don't want to deal with those annoyances in order to reduce the candidate count.

How is there a shortage? I'm more inclined to think that it's a problem finding "cheap" labor versus a shortage in labor.

And? What phone doesn't have a unique SIM card? Do you log into your google phone with a unique google account? Apple also has unique IDs for their system. Almost every service has a unique account just for you. Isn't this common practice?

He was caught because Microsoft had like 10 IP addresses recorded for that device's unique ID. Those same IPs were used for the remote desktop connections via ngrok to the same offending systems.

That's how they identified that it was his laptop specifically. It's not like MS specifically had logs of. They collaborated with all parties involved to paint a picture. This isn't exclusively a Microsoft privacy issue.

So it sounds like you're saying that wokies can't write? I mean, all their films are poorly written like you said. Maybe they shouldn't be involved in these big budget films if the investors are expecting a big profit.

You clearly don't understand what people mean when they say "woke", even though it's usually followed by all of the reasons that it's being called "woke". It sounds like you have a comprehension issue given your first sentence. I mean, you even called out Aliens.... which has been a prime example of what a non-woke film is that features a female lead.

I think we all know who the dumb one is here. Well, we all know except for you.

True, and one that can't stop talking about super girl possibly being a lesbian in interviews. Like whaaaaaat???? Since when? Must be another DEI movie, right? Why else would they even talk about that in interviews?

I don't understand your point. You can say that about any minority group when comparing it to a majority for any situation.

Are you saying that people who want privacy should just give it up because others who are in the majority don't care? You do understand that it's not about the people who don't care, right?

This legislation will solely affect the people who do care. Why do you have a right to dictate if someone else should have privacy or not?

Why, are schools getting rid of the other classes?

K-12 education has already lowered the bar to point where students can barely read or perform basic math, yet you post as if children aren't already uneducated when graduating.

Who will be at a greater disadvantage in 15 years; the ones who know how to use AI tools or the ones who don't?

Do you think that children who haven't worked or used it will be at a disadvantage? Do you think AI is going away? Keep in mind that employers are already relying it for job use. There used to be classes on how to type or use word processor apps and nobody seemed to complain then.

So you're saying that marriage has no incentive to a man other than bedroom fun?

You're probably right and there's not many younger traditional women out there where responsibilities are split by role. Instead, both parties do the same job. Nobody wants to work all day and then cook for a family of 3-4, or have to pay to eat out all the time.

Unfortunately, the US economy cannot support having only 1 person work to support a family. Wages are too low due to twice as many people in the work force from feminist pushes, and that's never going to reverse.

What are you even talking about lmfao? What does this have to do with current citizens not having children?

Ahh yess. I too had learned this several decades ago.

Both on the same day? You must be rich.

I never heard of it, but it sure sounds like something a retard would say.