Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:100% Accurate, Nearly All of the Time! (Score 1) 138

by qe2e! (#33205372) Attached to: Spinal-Fluid Test Confirmed To Predict Alzheimer's
I know there's more than one measure of accuracy in medical studies. I forget the jargon, but there's always a measure of false-negativeness and a measure of false-positiveness. While they do have to admit a false negative, "some afflicted lacked the indicator", they may be able to say, "100% of healthy patients lacked the indicator". Ergo if you ever found it, you just made an inarguable diagnosis. So maybe a reporter didn't grok the stat. The false negatives are curious, though - some small percentage of the population has diseased brain tissue but clean fluids, as if their braincar had a great new oil filter.
The Internet

+ - Reuters Image of Russian Subersible from Titanic

Submitted by
Juha-Matti Laurio
Juha-Matti Laurio writes "Footage purporting to show Russian explorers claiming the seafloor beneath the North Pole last week was in fact a scene from the 1997 film, reports The Independent. It took a 13-year-old Finnish boy to call a local newspaper pointing out that the footage looked identical to that in the film. According to Finnish Helsingin Sanomat publishing the pictures too 'at the time of the original broadcast, the vessels and their crews were known to be still some hours away from their destination'."

Have you ever noticed that the people who are always trying to tell you `there's a time for work and a time for play' never find the time for play?