
Journal pudge's Journal: Dean QuickHit 20
Dean's "I Have A Scream" speech is killing him. I won't say that what Dean said or did in that speech reflected any deficiency on his part, except for one: he does not know how to prevent himself from looking bad. It's not that what he said or did was wrong, but he appeared foolish to many people, and it is hurting him.
Not that I feel bad for him. I dislike him, and I've been predicting for months -- ever since I saw him on a major Meet the Press interview last summer -- that as more people saw more of him, as the races heated up, they would turn away. I just didn't imagine it would be over something so trivial.
OK, I guess I can't say this speech did him in: after all, he was slated to take 30% or more in Iowa, and only managed 18%, before The Scream. So he was already dropping, if you believe the many polls. Maybe Democrat voters are actually evaluating the man and his views and abilities, and not his scream.
I'm no pundit (Score:1)
However in New Hampshire Dean was leading by quite a few points and has been slated to take NH without any trouble. Then the Speech. Now he's trailing Kerry by about 10 points. Granted, some of the Kerry surge can be attributed to his win in Iowa and a lot of Democrats are flocking to be with the winning team, b
Re:I'm no pundit (Score:1)
Dean was cool. People want to be cool. But more important than being cool is being a winner. Kerry is a winner. Dean is not. Nothing succeeds like success.
Re:I'm no pundit (Score:2)
I think it was less that and more of how a "caucus" works -- as opposed to a "primary". While Dean's numbers were dropping, his weak placement may be due more to the public nature of a caucus -- and people are quite vocal on who they support and why -- and this is done BEFORE a head-count. It's not uncommon for '
Re:I'm no pundit (Score:2)
You sir, are a true independent. =)
Re:I'm no pundit (Score:2)
Politcally, I'm mostly a centrist. I cast a vote for Nader in an effort NOT to get Nader elected but to provide the Green party with matching FEC funds as I feel there are issues they support which I feel deserve some time in the spotlight.
Lieberman is a centrist, leaning left. Bush is all over the damn place -- not necessarily a BAD thing, but he's obviously not on the extreme right.
I said I would vote for Lieberman over Bush -- and I will. The problem I see is tha
Re:I'm no pundit (Score:2)
Re:I'm no pundit (Score:2)
I'd like to think so... Particularly when neither candidates back then did much for me. If I lived in almost any other state (Gore won CA by more than a million votes), I *may* have voted for Bush -- I'm honestly not sure. I am sure I wouldn't have voted fo
Re:I'm no pundit (Score:2)
I would vote for Kerry before anyone else on the Democrat side (except for *maybe* Clark; I don't know enough about him). While I disagree with his politics, he is not as far left as most of the others (except for Lieberman, of course), and he is respectable and has integrity. I lived in MA for many years, and I respect the man, despite my disagreements with him, sorta like how I respect Bill Bradley (though I do respect
Re:I'm no pundit (Score:2)
Thats $12 billion tax dollars -- the vast majority of which came from every other state in the union -- a
Re:I'm no pundit (Score:2)
However, I blame "Congress" for this. There is an unwillingness to stand up to inappropriate spending, to saying "this is not what the federal government should be doing."
What state are you from?
Re:I'm no pundit (Score:2)
Back to the dig: I agree, Congress is to blame, also -- but there was hard lobbying by Kennedy AND Kerry in the Senate. When the "dig" hit the $3 billion barrier, they should have been calling for inquiries and putting a stop to the problems. Again, I feel (read: my opinion) they hold a higher degree of responsibility (and all representatives of
Re: (Score:1)
Re:I'm no pundit (Score:2)
I think that's helping him, but who else would be the "frontrunner", if not Dean? People still don't know enough about Clark to trust him (at least, in large enough numbers), and Edwards is seen as the young and inexperienced one. That leaves Lieberman and Kerry.
Remember, Kerry was the "frontrunner" before Dean started picking up steam last summer. The big three were always Lieberman, Kerry, and Ge
Infinite repeat (Score:2, Insightful)
It was a story about J-Lo and Ben Affleck who have, it seems, broken up. The anchor, not without a bit of sarcastic humor, reported this tidbit, and then noted that there was a suitor who had expressed some interest in taking J-Lo on a romantic getaway...
And then they played The Scream -- Dean was the suitor, get it? -- "...to Michigan, to Oregon, to Cali
Re:Infinite repeat (Score:2)
Re:Infinite repeat (Score:2)
Then when people point out the irony they are accused of wearing tinfoil hats. Someone please tell me I'm not even passing the laugh test.
I can't wait for November. [zogby.com]
Re:Infinite repeat (Score:2)
Second, a grand jury investigation doesn't mean anything, as the whole purpose is to determine if there is enou
Dean bashing (Score:2)
"Iraq was not an imminent threat to the United States," Dean said. "It turned out they did not have the weapons of mass destruction that people thought they did, myself included. It turned out that much of what the president told us was not so."
What in the world? Before the war, Dean and Bush believed Iraq had WMD. After the war, we found out they didn't. Yet Bush is somehow wrong and should
Re:Dean bashing (Score:3, Insightful)
I think Dean is suggesting that the information he (Dean) used to construct his opinion about WMDs came from the current administration. Dean (and many other foes of the current administration) like to say "Bush lied". Not necessarily the most intellectually honest position. I see it more as an intellegence failure which is
Re:Dean bashing (Score:2)