Forgot your password?

Close
typodupeerror
United States

pudge's Journal: Old News is New Again 3

Journal by pudge

Think Progress has a big headline today: Bush Now Says What He Wouldn't Say Before War: Iraq Had 'Nothing' To Do With 9/11.

I draw your attention to September 2003, almost three years ago: "We have no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the 11 September attacks," Mr Bush told reporters as he met members of Congress on energy legislation.

This discussion was created by pudge (3605) for no Foes, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Old News is New Again More

Old News is New Again

Comments Filter:
  • So, we can expect more of that fantastic Leftist argument technique:

    "UBL is not in Iraq, why are we there?"

    "Iraq did not attack us on 9/11/01, why are we there?"

    "Nixon never went to Iraq, why are we there?"

    "Bush stole the Iraqi election, whyy are we there?"

    And from the Hon. Sen. John F. Kerry: "Christopher Reeve was never in Iraq, but if I were president he could walk there by now."
  • Clearly you are missing the greater Rovian complexities and nuances like all rightwin nutjobs who hate blacks and killed them with AIDS during Katrina which is a direct product of the 2000 elections and the whiterwatering of Clenis.

    Buscho SAID Saddam Hussein and 9/11 in the same sentence and the Sheeple understood it to mean whatever I need it to mean in a given internet blog!

A rolling stone gathers momentum.