
Journal pudge's Journal: Iraq was involved with 9/11? 8
Can someone find me President Bush, or anyone else in his administration, ever saying Iraq was one of the countries that attacked us on 9/11?
And I will not accept simply juxtaposing Iraq with al Qaeda, comparing them as equivalent or similar threats. That is not the same thing. You can argue that Bush meant to make an implication to that effect, but I will disagree, so don't bother. I want an actual unequivical statement, not what you think is an implication.
Also unacceptable is a quote of someone saying that Iraq and al Qaeda worked together, with Atta meeting Iraqi officials in Prague, and so forth. That is a recitation of intelligence data, it is not an analysis that therefore Iraq had something to do with 9/11. Even if al Qaeda and Iraq did share intelligence, even if they did some training or weapons sales or anything else of that sort, it does not stand to reason that therefore Iraq had anything to do with 9/11.
I think no such statement exists. Prove me wrong.
Now Playing: Dave Matthews - Gravedigger
this JE is a straw man (Score:2)
Cheney made himself look foolish though back in 2003: [boston.com]
Re:this JE is a straw man (Score:2)
Um, before you accuse me of a straw man, you should ask me.
I was told today that Bush said Iraq was involved with 9/11.
Re:this JE is a straw man (Score:2)
It's more like this JE is a straw man that's been erected, just not knocked down yet.
Re:this JE is a straw man (Score:2)
Was Hussein making himself look foolish when his intelligence service fed him a stream of reports of contacts with Al Qaeda representatives to keep him updated on their "relationship" (the regime's own word for it), or when he had pictures painted showing his beaming figure next to the burning twin towers?
From your own post, all you seem to have is that Cheney "fail[ed] to dismiss" the possibility; since evidence confirms they had ongoing contact and h
Prove me wrong (Score:2)
Have you ever admitted you were wrong about anything?
Not even for charity? ;)
You and I already had this discussion (as you know, because I IM'd you the URL) and it ended with your refusing to read what I wrote. If you like, you can start where you left off.
Re:Prove me wrong (Score:2)
Of course. I was wrong about that Sabo amendment, and I discovered that and told you. And I was going to mention it in the discussion, until you demanded that I do so, while yourself refusing to correct your own error. You corrected your error, and then I corrected mine.
You and I already had this discussion (as you know, because I IM'd you the URL) and it ended with your refusing to read what I wrote.
No, you have it backwards. It ended with you repeat [slashdot.org]
It's the other way around... (Score:2)
But 911 was involved with Iraq.
Sigh...
I just typed about 3 or 4 pages with of text to back this up. It's just not worth it. Either people already know and understand the reasons why we took out Iraq or they refuse to look at or outright dismiss the facts. Why waste my breath.
Interesting article (Score:2)
(Don't miss the links at the bottom; there's an additional exchange between the PR group mentioned in the story and the author.)