pudge's Journal: Escape From Iraq

A lot of pundits are talking about Bush trying to set conditions so he can "escape" from Iraq, because we're "losing" the war, and he finally realizes we need to "retreat."

But nothing significant has changed since the invasion. In the infamous-and-almost-universally-misremembered "Mission Accomplished" speech, far from Bush saying that the "mission" was "accomplished" in Iraq and that we would leave soon -- something that was never said, but most people believe he did -- he actually said:

We have difficult work to do in Iraq. ... The transition from dictatorship to democracy will take time, but it is worth every effort. Our coalition will stay until our work is done and then we will leave and we will leave behind a free Iraq.

Now, it turns out the work was even more difficult than Bush figured. But that did not change the exit plan: we would stay until the political structure of Iraq was rebuilt, and could stand on its own. That is still the plan.

It's nonsensical to say that Bush is trying to "escape" by pulling out U.S. troops as Iraqi forces can take control; that is not retreat, that is the definition of success.

Exeunt?

[nandorman]

And it also idiotic for folks to claim a) that there is no exit strategy or b) there has never been an exit strategy. Do these people actually pay attention to what the administration says (the answer is yes, they do, but they simply choose to ignore it in place of sensationalism and outright lying)? It's been clear from the beginning that the plan was to leave when Iraq was democratic and could take care of itself. Now, one may disagree with that strategy, but it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist!