
Journal pudge's Journal: Second-Class Citizens 5
If "[treated like] second-class citizens" means "getting only necessary treatment," then absolutely, people who are getting their care paid for by tax dollars should be treated like second-class citizens. The purpose of these programs is to help people who have needs they cannot pay for by themselves, not to make their lives as good as they would be if they could pay for themselves.
birth control? (Score:2)
some women want them just to have them.
some women want them to keep them from being pregnant.
some need the pills for medical reasons.
yet, with all the above, our tax dollars are paying for it.
good? bad?
or is paying for everyone to have them the lesser evil then a lot more unwanted/unplanned-for mouths to feed?
Re:birth control? (Score:2)
I have no particular objection to taxpayer funding for birth control, apart from more general objections about federal government paying for health care in the first place. It doesn't fall under the same heading as ED treatment does.
Re:birth control? (Score:2)
Interesting.
some women want them just to have them.
Then they can buy them.
some women want them to keep them from being pregnant.
My take:
You don't want to get fat, put the fork down.
You don't want to gamble your money away, don't go to a casino.
You don't want to get pregnant, don't f*** around.
some need the pills for medical reasons.
And *that* should be covered by medicare/medicaid, etc. Though, most people on these programs are too old to suffer from endome
Disease? (Score:3, Insightful)
By the same token baldness is a disease, and we all deserve a full head of hair, right?
Re:Disease? (Score:2)
I can see it now, the "No Scalp Left Behind Act of 2005" Won't someone please think of the pates?.
I could actually SEE them doing that....