Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
The Courts

+ - On Game Development And 'Patent Trolls'

Submitted by simoniker
simoniker (40) writes "Video game lawyer Dr. S. Gregory Boyd has written up a detailed feature on the history of litigation in the game biz, and part of it focuses on the so-called 'patent troll' for games — he comments: "Keep in mind also that patents are presumed valid in litigation and the defendants have to show by "clear and convincing" evidence that the patents are invalid — a lot of hard work. Imagine the burden that all of this puts on a company like Microsoft, Nintendo, or a large developer. Furthermore, imagine how asymmetric the burden (and cost) is when compared to the patent troll." One major example of this is the American Video Graphics suit, which was settled earlier this year by game companies including Atari, EA, and others — the patent covered any 3D game engine that uses camera movement or zooming of any kind relative to a specific object!"

Computer Science is merely the post-Turing decline in formal systems theory.

Working...