I stand corrected - mostly. The company needs to drop his vendettas now that he's gone. They can keep a very respectful and profitable company while protecting their IP without the vendettas.
I've had three different iPhones, an original, my 16GB 3G and the 8GB 3G I bought used to replace the 16GB one I broke. I now have an Evo 4G.
They are both great phones for different reasons and other than the fact they both have touch interfaces and cover the same basic functions they're nothing alike. When I first started using Android there was quite a learning curve. I had to get used to the "pull down shutter" interface at the top (which I now love BTW), I had to get used to the applications existing not just on multiple desktops if I so desire but in an actual application "drawer". My Android phone multi-task. The music interface is inferior to the iPhone, but it plays Ogg/Vorbis and I even figured out how to embed album covers in the file and make them display. The lack of being stuck with only Apple approved formats an iTunes was a huge improvement to me.
Maybe the Google guys did run off with a couple of iPhone ideas, but as a consumer who's used both the two platforms are incredibly different and the Google stuff on my old iPhone is a lot of what made my old iPhone usable - it's not like Apple's never taken anyone else's idea.
The anti-Android vendetta needs to stop.
The Pystar / Mac Clone thing, meh, could go either way, I think they have a debatable case there (yes, they won the debate, I'm talking about my perspective).
Intentionally setting iPhones to brick if you try to break the bootloader is just incredibly prickish and even though I'm not sure if they should be civilly liable for that or not I still think Steve and others on his staff making sure it happened needed to be repeatedly kicked in the nuts for making that happen. Really, once you sell it to someone else it's not yours anymore.