Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:It's not him.. (Score 1) 681

by os10000 (#48735839) Attached to: Neil DeGrasse Tyson Explains His Christmas Tweet

Your first sentence is the best characterisation I have read.

People should go and look up "culpable deniability".

I believe that the tweet was meant to first raise warm feelings in the believers and then to deliberately debase this elevation by pointing to an icon for the perceived opposing faction. I find "baiting" a very appropriate word to describe the process.

I also find it witty. Yet, I don't think it is clever to address a public which already supports cutting the science budget with something that further infuriates them.

Comment: please be scholars about this (Score 1) 770

by os10000 (#47879017) Attached to: How Scientific Consensus Has Gotten a Bad Reputation

I recommend you consult your friendly "history & philosophy of science" major to explain this topic to you. As a second-best option, please read the book "the history of scientific revolutions". As a worst, last resort, please consider this explanation of mine:

--- define the terms:

* bertrand russel said (I paraphrase): "things that can be known are the domain of science, things that cannot be known are the domain of theology and things and the stuff in between is the domain of philosophy"

* the difference between science and engineering is that science tries to explain stuff and that engineering tries to predict future environments and optimise a solution for that expectation

--- describe the process:

* science obtains (repeatable) experimental results, then develops a theory to explain those results, then takes the theory to its extremes (where it breaks) and repeats the cycle

* a fine example of this cycle is kepler-newton-einstein

* do a basic course in logic: deduction is not the same as induction; the scientific process includes a step which amasses a convincing body of evidence and argument to get us to a consensus that something which has a clear correlation is also in a causal relationship; deduction is applicable in areas of causality; any single contradicting (repeatable) experiment is qualified to undo this consensus

* please observe that the more accurate model (in the kepler-newton-einstein cascade) still holds for all previous results and that the observed error is not allowed to grow with the next acceptable model

* when you have multiple theories from different corners of science that finely explain their respective experimental evidence, yet they contradict each other, then we acknowledge the situation and keep looking

* a fine example is relativity vs. quantum

* climate science is where a mix of multiple disciplines have recently come together; they can't even explain what they do themselves, let alone explain what happens at the intersection

* rising sea levels is a fine example: apparently rising sea levels are the least disputed observable phenomenon from "global warming"; and water is a fine energy store and is snarfing up a lot of energy; yet water volume depends on both temperature and pressure; it seems that we don't know where (which layer of water) the absorbed energy ends up in -- yet this affects gravely how much expansion we see

--- conclusion & recommendation

* please keep collecting facts

* please propose ever more outlandish models and check them against the collected data

* talk to each other, discuss and debate

* try to find experiments which break existing theories

best regards,


Comment: rule of law (Score 1) 409

by os10000 (#43089947) Attached to: The Accidental Betrayal of Aaron Swartz

Western society claims to be founded on two principles: democracy and "rule of law". I am disillusioned with both these claims. If there are so many laws that you are likely violating something at any point in time and not every violation is prosecuted, then the situation from enforcing laws is turned on its head to hunting people -- which is precisely what "rule of law" is claimed to not do. Having hierarchically structured political parties that the voter is restricted to chosing from extinguishes the benefits claimed of democracy.

Comment: helloooo??????? (Score 2) 268

by os10000 (#40971731) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Personal Tape Drive NAS?

As everyone else, that using a collection of tapes with a single or small number of tape drives is impractical.

Instead, I recommend reading up on hierarchical storage:

Also, if you really want a solution which does what you ask for, SamFS may be for you:



Comment: Ubuntu Founder knows about signing ... (Score 5, Interesting) 393

by os10000 (#40410611) Attached to: Ubuntu Lays Plans For Getting Past UEFI SecureBoot

Hi Guys & Gals,

before you all get worked up, please remember that Ubuntu was founded by Mark Shuttleworth. Mark became a billionaire by running Thawte. Thawte is a certificate authority for X.509 certificates.

My take is he knows a thing or two about such infrastructures and I also think he is a positive influence for the free software world.

have a good day!

Comment: Technology from 1992 (Score 1) 112

by os10000 (#33821636) Attached to: Finding Lost IT With RFID

We had tags for people and assets (printers, photocopiers, overhead projectors, computer manuals) that were used for location information, for door access, for having your computer screen follow around (they built an X-proxy and later developed it into VNC). This was 1992-1999 at the University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory in cooperation with the Olivetti Research labs (was changed to AT&T research labs or the other way around), who manufactured the devices. The tags worked on infrared, so putting them in your pocket would hide them. The people tags had rapid updates (few seconds) and the asset tags seldom updates (minutes). It was a voluntary experiment and I estimate 2/3 of the staff had them. Today I'm a privacy zealot.

Comment: homegrown java (Score 1) 421

by os10000 (#28445209) Attached to: How Do You Sync & Manage Your Home Directories?


I have built a java program. You can find it here:

* it is GPL
* it is used for exporting and importing
* it creates a digital certificate for the machine it's run on
* it creates a 1-1 relationship with a machine that it's synching with
* it creates an export file on the source machine & imports it on the target machine (you have to move it)
* the export file is a zip file
* you build a ruleset on the export machine (files, directories, regexes) what you wish to export
* you build a ruleset on the import machine (same) what you wish to import
* these two rulesets give you total control even when you're exchanging with someone else
* you have rules for "soft master", "hard master", "soft slave", "hard slave", "progress", etc.

If you can use "unison", use that. If you wish to automate, use "app_dsync".

Have a good day,


If you can't understand it, it is intuitively obvious.