Forgot your password?

Comment: Not news (Score 1) 217

by oh (#48023881) Attached to: Man Walks Past Security Screening Staring At iPad, Causing Airport Evacuation

Not news for 2 reasons

    1) standard practice to re-screen if someone has bypassed screening

    2) this has happened several times before (see links below)

The only thing that made this relevant for slashdot was the presence of an iPad (Ah Ha! A technology angle!). That said, the exit from T3 isn't that secure, but it is a domestic terminal. The domestic terminals use pretty standard x-ray of belongings and a metal detector. In other words, just like getting into an office building in downtown New York. The security is nothing like the international terminals which are about the same level as at US airports.

Comment: Re:Here's how you tell a compelling story. (Score 1) 192

Ignoring the joke answers this is probably the best answer here.

We work in support services - unless you are an IT service provider you aren't part of the business that makes money. You support the business, but you aren't the business. Think about all those other support functions, HR, finance, legal, office facilities - they are all needed too but I don't often hear them asking to be appreciated by management.

To the OP - What is your objective? You say you want management to "appreciate the hard work that an IT department does?" - but why?

    * Job security?
    * Pay/conditions?
    * To make yourself feel good?

Turn the question around and ask "What does management appreciate?" - Face it, you aren't going to change your your boss but you can change the way you communicate, or better still, change the way you do things.

Do they value cost control? Show how you did your job on a budget - grab some analyst papers and show how you do it cheaper then comparable industry segments. If you start reporting on this then it will also drive yourself to manage costs well, so you should be able to report on cost savings and improvements. Be honest about who YOUR competitors are - your should be benchmarking yourself against outsourcers and "cloud" vendors. Again, this drive behaviour, make the cost comparison and deliver what management really wants.

If you have management that hates downtime, but you have trouble showing the hard work you do to maintain that - rethink what you are doing. You aren't keeping the systems up, you are addressing things that could go wrong. Do you maintain an operational risk matrix? Start formally recording and tracking what could go wrong, use it to focus you work appropriately and summarise this to management to demonstrate all the monsters under the bed you are chasing out that they never see. It is also a great way to get funding if you report on something in the risk matrix for 18 month as a future issue.. You have the opportunity to forecast things like hardware refreshes and forced software upgrades to management - presented in terms that are meaningful to them (e.g. "medium risks of downtime costing >$250,000 revenue can be resolved for $75,000") and you are able to report on all the risks you have removed? Are you working on things that aren't in the risk matrix? Why? Either get it on the risk matrix, start reporting it as project work (that someone else can justify the value of) or stop doing it.

Excuse the cynicism, but while it is possible that you are doing a great job you management would love if they knew, the fact you are asking the question highlights that you don't understand what senior management values. If you don't understand, how do you know you really are doing a valuable job? Sure you are working hard, but that isn't the same. I have seen technically competent hardworking people loose their jobs to outsourcers because they weren't delivering what senior management expected. Unless you are prepared to re-think your priorities to you are not going to get the results you want.

Comment: Why would you automatically trust on-site IT? (Score 2, Insightful) 730

by oh (#29059225) Attached to: Why Should I Trust My Network Administrator?

There seems to be an assumption that you can "keep an eye" on an on-site network administrator, and that's why you can trust them.

How would you tell if they were up to no good? Will you be looking over their shoulder constantly?
I have worked in medium size IT shops (appro 100 people), and have seen the system admin team all stand around a computer as they go through their manager's CV (they had left it on there home drive). This was practically outside the manager's office, but you can't be everywhere at once.

Maybe you assume that you will only hire trustworthy people, but how can you tell if you can trust someone just by working with them?

Personally, I think the bigger risk to your operation will be if you hire a bad sysadmin.


Comment: Re:Depressing, but not uncommon (Score 1) 1251

by oh (#28950991) Attached to: Student Sues University Because She's Unemployable

Sucks for you. I get 20 days PTO + 8 holidays + 2 floats. In the three years at my company, I've taken one sick day. I'm thankful that my sickdays come out of vacation, otherwise, I'd have 2 weeks vacation and 2 weeks of wasted sick days a year.

Go up a couple of levels. You get 22 days a year (excluing public holidays) if you aren't sick.

I get 20 days a year if I'm not sick. If I do get sick, I will still have still have 20 days of paid leave. Over three years, you end up ahead by 5 days. If you catch a bad flu shortly, we break even.

Your lucky not to have been sick, things changed for me when I had kids.

Comment: Re:Hence the need for a well-armed civil society. (Score 1) 325

by oh (#26662949) Attached to: Fannie Mae Worker Indicted For Malicious Script

I realise that you are not beign a troll, but I really have to reply to that.

You site Combodia as an example, I site Gaza. Whatever your polictical believfs are, you have to admit the presence of large numebrs of firearms, and even rockets, did little to prevent a heavily armed military from doing basically whatever they liked.

Do you honestly think your community could stand up against the US army? Because that is what you are sugesting.

In the 1700's both sides were armed with primitive firearms, relatively simple to make, with low range. Today, they can send a missile onto your house, bomb from high altitude, shell you from a tank, use a sniper, or even if you could get close enough you are just up against profesional traind soldiers, with bullet proof vests, and machine guns.

"Gotcha, you snot-necked weenies!" -- Post Bros. Comics