Comment Re: I thought (Score 2) 197
Na, it relates to time and money to take prep courses and buy study materials.
Na, it relates to time and money to take prep courses and buy study materials.
Judging based on the performance of his autopilot, we should be safe for a while.
I got mine from the Google store. What's to stop Glance from working with manufacturers here? I hope Google doesn't put it on Pixels. There's no way I'm paying for a flagship phone with ads on the lock screen.
I've used Android since the beginning. If this is required, I will jump to iPhone so fast.
Remember when Tesla tried to charge someone 22k to replace a battery? https://www.businessinsider.co...
Unless we have right to repair and the equipment and training are available to independent shops, I won't buy a car directly from the manufacturer.
There were computer science and intro to programming courses long before code.org existed. I took them, and my tools were notepad and the jdk. No web ides.
All the kids need is notepad and the JDK. If they want to make it easier, they can use the Python interpreter.
I look forward to having this update forced on me one Tuesday night and having my boot sector yeeted into the sun.
Poor Google, it appears their attempts to reduce their labor costs are not going as well as they'd hoped.
Based on standardized test scores, a good chunk of this country have trouble with math and reading. From my memory, a lot of kids could do the core math, but fell apart when it came time to apply the math in word problems. Programming is word problems with typing. Maybe Google should focus on helping America with reading and writing first.
Dark science, cloning, secrets only the Sith knew.
Technical Alpha - Games, Movies, and TV. And fun times.
If it didn't have a notch, I'd get one. It has everything else I want. Waterproofing would have been nice.
> Java licenses are free to developers, but companies incorporating the technology into their platforms are required to pay, Oracle said.
> But Google rejected a deal for the proper Oracle license because it didn't want to meet Oracle's demands for Java compatibility—it didn't want Android apps to run on other platforms, Oracle said in the brief.
> That strategy ultimately prevented Oracle from licensing and competing in the developing smartphone market.
But seriously, what was their phone strategy? They weren't developing their own mobile phone. Android was released in 2008. Oracle didn't buy Sun until 2010. I guess Sun had this one: https://www.engadget.com/2006/... They released over 2 years ahead of Google. Over a year ahead of Apple And then nothing.
Were they just planning on nickel and diming platforms for Java usage?
I know it hasn't been an option recently, but the new AMD CPUs, including mobile, look pretty good. Wouldn't it be easier to just switch to them? Or do they have their own equivalent of IME?
[citation needed]
"Aww, if you make me cry anymore, you'll fog up my helmet." -- "Visionaries" cartoon