There is an app called LBE security (or something simmilar, search for LBE), where you can give/take away permissions, and you can have the app prompt for some permissions ona per-use basis.

So, if angry birds wants location info, you get a pop-up, choose Don't allow (because it doesnt need it), mark 'remember', and continue playing.

The bigger question is, what data does the aplication itself send around, since it requires a rooted phone.

Marconi lost his patent. Sadly, Tesla was already dead by then.

Of course they did...

http://htcdev.com/devcenter/downloads

VTP servers also accept configuration from other VTP servers, so they act as clients too.

Easy!

Have a scaled-down copy of the production network in a lab, with all the same settings (like VTP domain etc.), test weird things (like it's normally done in a lab enviroment), and get the rev. number up high.

Then some piece of production equipment fails, (let's say a switch), and why not take one (basically the same one) from the lab? The lab can wait for the replacement, production usually can not. Then plug the switch to the production network, and puff, there go the vlans!

Nope...
There's no was Apple could do something like this...

Yes you can(*)(**) :)


*You can use quagga and it will work as a BGP router, if your (private) network uses BGP.
**If you want to use it as a core router: that's why I wrote "pretty much" before "anything"... But still, you can connect it as a core router... it would be interesting to see how long will it stay online, and how many routes can it recieve before it crashes :)

RouterStation Pro has everything:

-gigE
-mini pci slot for wifi cards
-enough ram for pretty much anything

(some assembly required :))

I do not work for them, and am not payed by them, just a happy user

They don't have standing, as they do not hold any copyrights over that code

Why would they need it? If you go to the shop and buy, for example, a media/dvd/etc. player, which uses GPL code, you're entitled to get the source to the program. If the company doesnt give you the source, you could sue. Or can anyone prove me otherwise?

It seems the bug is applicable just to RHEL (for which patches are provided) and distributions which intentinally have the option disabled (to run wine? - why??).