> I always hated the "show your work" because I could usually do it in my head a lot faster so I never bothered.
The thing is, for most purposes "I did in in my head" turns a solution into uselessness. Solutions to problems are things that you can communicate with others. There is almost as much value in *how* you got to a solution as in the solution itself, because a good *how* actually adds value. No one builds a 100 floor building after an engineer computed something in his head.
Most of what you learn is not useful in itself, but as a way to teach you how to "show your work". The showing of your work is what really counts.
The standard argument I get from [university] students when I fail them for not making their reasoning explicit is that because the problem was easy, it was pointless. The underlying idea is that they can simply skip the communicative part of solving something easy, and magically when they are confronted with the problem of communicating something difficult they'll somehow manage.
Hating-the-"show-your-work" is simply something you have to get over.
Gnome2 should be forked and development continued by people with functioning brains.
Well, then: do it.
The ones currently developing are quite free to do the same: exactly what they want.
It is contrary to reasoning to say that there is a vacuum or space in which there is absolutely nothing. -- Descartes