Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:oblig (Score 0) 625

by mprinkey (#44849967) Attached to: 45% of U.S. Jobs Vulnerable To Automation

I don't think that the author got it all exactly right, but your points are wrong. Business is driven mindlessly by ONE THING--maximizing profitability. The time will come...and right soon...when machines will work well enough to eliminate many existing blue collar jobs and a large fraction of low-skilled white collar jobs too. There is and will be pushback, in the form of higher minimum wages and requirements for health insurances. And all those pushbacks do is accelerate the process. We can likely thank China, India, and Mexico for providing cheap labor and forestalling the onset of this mechanization a decade or two. Had they not been there to take our manufacturing jobs, serious automation efforts would have started even in the early 90s. As greed is the only acceptable (and fiduciarily mandated) corporate ethos, we should expect corps to follow its guiding light to its logical end. As soon as Walmart can stock their shelves with a robot, they will. As soon as McDonalds can reliably serve food without a single worker on staff, they will. As soon as Fedex can roll a Google truck, they will. Human labor is viewed as a "commodity" and it reliably becomes more expensive with time.

I think the mistake that the author makes is that he assumes humans will be part of the machine. They won't. There will be strikes and protests and maybe even legislation, but those will only slow the pace of change, not stop it. The US and Western European economies will look quite different in 50 years. I doubt anything but boutique items will be made even in part by humans. Before then, we will all have to ask ourselves what we do with our time and how do we provide for our needs. The end of the story effectively contrasts two possible outcomes.

Comment: Re:quick key repetition (Score 2) 207

by mprinkey (#44442481) Attached to: More Encryption Is Not the Solution

Replace the 100 million key dictionary with a PRNG seeded with a secret key, some time information, and source/destination ports and addresses. The NSA would have the PRNG, the key, and the seeding input from the packet. They could deduce the key without much effort and the keys would appear truly random to anyone without knowledge of the secret key, no matter the sample size.

Comment: How do you limit authentication?! (Score 1) 194

by mprinkey (#43874075) Attached to: Motorola Developing Pill and Tattoo Authentication Methods

This idea is terrible. It is even worse than RFID credit cards. Since it has active electronics, I assume this is able to do challenge/response authentication, which is good. But how do you disable it? Somebody just "bumps" into you with a scanner and pays their dinner bill with your gut. At least RFID-chipped cards can be stored in a conductive pouch to prevent walk-by theft.

Whatever shape these new authentication methods take, they need to be at minimum:

(1) Challenge/Response based, and
(2) Momentary ON

Requirement 1 kills most biometrics systems. And Requirement 2 kills most implant/ingested systems.

Comment: Re:Timex Sinclair 1000 (Score 1) 623

by mprinkey (#43852479) Attached to: How Did You Learn How To Program?

Yeah...TImex Sinclair 1000, a hand-me-down BW TV from my grandfather, and my old tape recorder. That was the beginning for me...back in 6th grade. I bought from Hills for $50, I think. I spend many hours on it...until the C64 and floppy drive came a few Christmas' later. I look back on those days and the oceans of free time I had...peeking and poking and disassembling code. I remember spending many hours typing in code from Compute! Gazette...that was all C64. And Transactor too.

Comment: Re:My first computer (Score 1) 212

by mprinkey (#39767801) Attached to: Sinclair ZX Spectrum 30th Anniversary

I had the Timex Sinclair 1000 as well, but not 16KB module. Paid $60 for it at Hills--I was in 6th grade. It learned quickly to be careful with my precious 2k of RAM, but I coded a fairly accurate image of the Space Shuttle and figured out how to make it "fly" across the screen. Hard to believe I have been writing code for almost 30 years!

Comment: Re:*Orbital* angular momentum (Score 1) 147

by mprinkey (#39221111) Attached to: 'Twisted' Waves Could Boost Capacity of Wireless Spectrum

I think the key take-away is that there is another physical signal dimension to exploit--frequency, directionality, polarization, and now orbital angular momentum. They have demonstrated that they can distinguish between two channels on the same frequency using orbital angular momentum as the differentiator. So, OAM mode can be added to the tool kit. If they can distinguish among a few dozen modes and still allow beam forming, this could provide a huge benefit for cellular and other wireless networks. If they can distinguish among hundreds or thousands of modes, it could be truly transformative. It has been a long time since my EM class, but I wonder if similar mode discrimination could be applied to waveguides.

Comment: Re:fused off? Really?! (Score 4, Informative) 127

by mprinkey (#38216420) Attached to: NVIDIA Launches GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448-Core GPU

Probably referring to efuses that can be burned out on the die. These are common and allow CPU/GPUs to have unit-specific information (like serial numbers, crypto keys, etc) coded into otherwise identical parts from the fab. Video game systems like the 360 use them as an anti-hacking measure...disallowing older version of firmware to run on systems that have certain efuses "blown." Likely, there is an efuse for each core or group of cores. Those can be burned out if they are found to be defective or to simply cripple a portion of the part for down-binning. That is a practice at least as old as the Pentium 2.

Comment: Re:Offsite backups (Score 1) 320

by mprinkey (#37907138) Attached to: Which OSS Clustered Filesystem Should I Use?

Truecrypting external USB/eSATA drives are by far the better option. We also use normal 3.5" drives with external USB/eSATA docks. There are NO cheap tape solutions anymore. I'd further argue that what tape solutions exist are trumped by hard drive backup solutions for on-site backup--far slower and no more reliable than hard drives. Tape is dead. Anyone still using them is either leveraging a 5-to-10-year-old investment in a tape robot or is being sold a bill of goods by a vendor.

Comment: Re:It feels too heavy and old (Score 3, Insightful) 242

by mprinkey (#37606922) Attached to: Looking Back On a Year of LibreOffice

I have to agree about the heft. But I prefer the "old" style interface. I had to install Office 2007 to interact with some clients and I am completely lost. I've been using word processors since the C64 days, but this is the first time I decades that I have stared blankly at a program and had to click on every menu/button/active splotch trying to find out how to turn on Track Changes.

Of course, people can get used to the interface and maybe following the mythical transition, I will be enamored with its interface glory. But it just seems different for difference's sake...like .docx and .xlsx where.

To the LibreOffice folks, you really need to do a top-down performance/memory analysis. I like it and will continue to use it, but I don't see why it needs to be the resource hog it is.

Comment: Re:How many commenters have BUILT a cluster!? (Score 1) 264

by mprinkey (#37412792) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Clusters On the Cheap?

The difference is even bigger than you posted! You made a math error on the Sandy Bridge FLOP calculation:

64 Sandy Bridge Cores: 8 FLOPS/Hz * 2.8 GHz * 64 cores = 1433.6 GFLOPS

48 Magny Cours: 4 FLOPS/Hz * 2.1 GHz * 48 cores = 403.2 GFLOPS

So, Sandy Bridge is roughly 3.5 times faster than AMD.

And the original poster commented that the application was parceling out data sets and crunching on the independently, so the application is embarassingly parallel. This design would be rubbish for any *real* parallel application, but I think it is optimal for OP's stated goal.

Logic is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence.