Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:Terrible article (Score 1) 425

Can you be more specific as to what you're calling bullshit to? I didn't make any bold claims as far as I can tell.

Burning 500 calories for a 2 hour walk is a reasonably conservative figure for an adult human. For most humans it will be more, for some it will be a little less. The greatest influence on that figure is body mass. And with each step requiring energy to lift your body mass (that is not recovered on the down step), to a certain height (dictated by leg length and stride), a minimum amount of energy required can be calculated. That's just physics, no way around that. Any in-efficiencies will only increase that number. If you can find an adult who can walk for 2 hours and burn substantially less than several hundred calories.... well, you won't.

So going back to my original reply, a human that takes in 1000 calories a day and burns ~500 calories a day through exercise, has only ~500 calories of energy intake left to power their body's everyday activities. Considering that an adult's basal metabolic rate is typically in the 1,500 to 2000 range, you'll need to be burning your body fat, and eventually muscle, to stay alive. If for some unlikely reason your body was in fact storing fat under those conditions, you're going to be very ill, very soon.

Comment Re:Terrible article (Score 2) 425

Sorry to be presumptuous, but that can not be right. Assuming by exercise you mean something at least as vigorous as walking, two hours of that will burn ~500 calories alone. That leaves you with around 500 calories of energy to keep your body alive. Your body would not be able to cope with that for extended periods of time, and there's no chance it would reserve those precious calories as body fat.

Comment Re:I'll have to give it another look.... (Score 3, Interesting) 111

I'd agree that some of the community doesn't think about stuff like that, but on the whole, KDE is the least frustrating desktop environment I've ever used. And I've probably used more than most.

I'm not saying it's not without its faults, but KDE actually has plenty of very thoughtful touches, sane defaults and UI polish. OS X is generally pretty good and then there is Windows, 'nuff said.

All just my personal opinion of course. When it comes to things like GUIs, different people will always favour different ways of doing things.

Comment Re:I'll have to give it another look.... (Score 2) 111

It's one of the little "fit and finish" things that Windows and OS X do so well

I'm not sure I'd say OS X does it well, from my experience at least. It seems to work fine most of the time but some of the core utilities, especially Finder, 'forget' their window size on seemingly ransom occasions and it annoys the hell out of me.

On the other hand, most (if not all) of the GUI applications I tend to use in KDE remember their size and position without a hitch. Things like Dolphin and Konsole, that I am very particular about in their arrangement, open up in the same layout every time. Granted, that's probably down to the apps, not the OS, but I can't say it's ever bothered me.

Comment Re:The unaccomplished always envy achievement, eh? (Score 1) 112

I'm a long time OpenWRT user and have been running it on 3 or 4 devices over the years. Admittedly it has been a few months since I have checked out the router hardware market, but last time I checked, you couldn't get comparable hardware specs to this (1.6GHz dual-core ARM, 4GB flash, 1GB RAM, gigabit on all ports, USB3, SATA) for anything close to $95 (half of the cost of this router). I'm doubtful you can get that today for even the full asking price of $189 although I'd be pleased to hear otherwise.

Comment Re:Step One (Score 1) 47

Pretty much what I was going to say. Without any more details of the project, it is hard to give suggestions on how to move forward with it, or collaborate on it, but putting it on Github is a great start and as parent poster said, you have nothing to lose.

Slashdot Top Deals

Dealing with the problem of pure staff accumulation, all our researches ... point to an average increase of 5.75% per year. -- C.N. Parkinson