Install some others source with your own cert, and it can cause issues.
Apple's issue, if there is one, would be shipping a device with working encryption.
I would advise you to go back to your course components on non-parametric and Baysean statistics.
Because a study isn't ideal (and I am not saying that small studies like this are ideal) does not mean that they are devoid of useful information. If you don't understand statistics well enough to use that information, then that's fine. But your incomprehension does not give you the right to go around accusing other people of fraud in a public place.
That sounds like I would say if I was running a fraudulent study.
Between all the name calling, I gather your point as expense of a medial trail being too expensive.
Because, come on... a trial with only nine subjects is not a trial... it's simply a fraud. Even, in the US you need a jury twelve to get a criminal conviction.
Like I care about the chimps... I care about humans. How many of those people get dosed for each monkey in your bogus-trial?
Wow, it's up to 200% effective!?!?!?!?!
That's the level of accuracy we are dealing with here folks.
A sample size of nine isn't a study; it's a fraud.
Basically the way it's explained, Russian's don't hate gays, and liberals won't protect them. They just see the gay movement as more of a way to attack the existing power structure. Is Clay Aiken really good for NC, or is he Chicken Little, setup on an issued that is only designed to get Chicken Little elected?
I'm not so sure. I'm thinking that Hanlon's Razor [wikipedia.org] should be applied here.
The corollary? Nothing is provable; everything is permissible.
Your adage is one of a pushover. You are a sucker, and you promote being one.