Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Comment Very Interesting (Score 1) 1 1

This is interesting you bring this up. I've had discussions with other folks who think that fiber will one day take over wireless. I think it's a case by case basis where no one technology rules them all. In some areas, such as your remote location, wireless may be more cost effective to deploy since there's no need to put poles in the ground every few hundred feet.

In extremely dense areas though, like down-town Phili, wireless may or may not work as well as Fiber due to the sheer bandwidth requirements and limited spectrum.

Submission + - The NEW Current Status of Wireless 1 1

PalletBoy writes: I submitted a question on Monday September 12, 2005 @ 02:20PM to /. entitled "What is the Current Status of WiMAX?". 8 years later we are finally up and running on microwave hops from tower to tower directly back to Fiber. The RTT's between our location and the fiber pop are averaging 7ms. This tech is way cheaper than the combo of DSL and T1s we had (roughly 1/3) and is also 12x faster and scalable to gigabit levels once our biz requires it.

With the new possibility of the spectrum auction and the coming
5G tech, how soon before DSL, Cable, and fiber tech like Fios get added to The Big Internet Museum?

Comment I don't this works... (Score 1) 185 185

Doesn't OnStar use the cellular network to communicate information back to the "mother-ship"?

I find it hard to believe GM is actually footing the bill for all of these cars when the end-user isn't paying the on-star fee.

Can anyone explain how this is working?

Those who claim the dead never return to life haven't ever been around here at quitting time.