Comment: Re:Google said it best.. (Score 1) 356
Search, don't sort.
...most files aren't going to have enough data in the filename and tags (if any) to search for pictures from Uncle Bob's second wedding...
How many dates did it take place on and how many other things did you take pictures of on the same date(s)? The date of the wedding should be at least enough to get a search result with a high density of what you're looking for.
Comment: Re:PDF files will render as seamlessly as HTML? (Score 1) 285
Comment: Re:Facebook and privacy is an oxymoron (Score 2, Insightful) 329
Comment: Re:Am I missng something? (Score 2, Interesting) 193
Comment: Re:Am I missng something? (Score 2, Insightful) 193
Microsoft Patches "Google Hack" Flaw In IE 142
from the you-saw-this-coming dept.
Comment: Re:Lightning (Score 2, Informative) 379
Comment: Re:..bungle, bungle.... (Score 1) 496
Comment: Re:Maybe good in theory (Score 1) 175
Still better than most Telcos DNS.
I agree. That's the reason why I did my first DNS server install at home. My ISP was a telco and their DNS server was down a lot more frequently than their IP routing. Most of my Internet usage was evenings and weekends. The ISP was a 9-5 business for home users (i.e. not 5 nines). So, I'd have to wait hours, even days sometimes for name resolving to return. I've maintained my own DNS server ever since and never had to worry about it.
It's obviously not for everyone and there are reliable servers beyond many ISPs, like the Level 3 ones referred to in other posts.