Comment: Re:bias in publications? (Score 2) 959
Not if the author has actual data. Authors who go against a known field of study that don't actually have good data risk their careers, as they should.
And if the data goes against dogma, it is called into question. Something was not done correctly or quite often, the researcher is accused of fabricating the results. I've seen this way too often in Medical, Psychological and Physics research. Granted, these were papers close to thirty and plus years ago, but I suspect things have only gotten worse in this regard, not better.