It is, indeed, very high, but still true.
It is, indeed, very high, but still true.
No, thermal usually means coal.
You don't need to reduce your living space or reduce climate control to reduce your CO2 emissions. Just having higher standards for thermal insulation and heating/cooling of houses can reduce the energy consumption of the average crappy American house by 75% (note: almost all the buildings in the US have a very poor energy efficiency). Thicker and more efficient insulation layers in the walls/roof/floor, double glazing with good sealing for the windows, a condensing boiler (or better: a heat pump) for heating and hot water, a few thermal solar cells on the roof, and a reasonably efficient air conditioning: these things will probably add 10-15% to the total construction cost of a house, but will easily be amortized over 2 decades (just by the reduced energy consumption).
And regarding the other things like walking instead of driving, that's riduculous. Just begin by buying a car with a reasonable gas milage (hint: you don't need a 5000-lb vehicle with a 5000cc engine to go to work every day). And support an improvement of mass transit where it is sound (hint: using mass transit actually supports it).
Eating less meat, yeah, that's probably a good thing to do. But the good news is: you can eat better meat. Eat 2 filet mignon per week instead of 8 burgers.
Cell phones have a peak emission power of up to 3W and usually transmit a few 100s of mW.
The only thing that the flight control computer could be blamed for was to stop issuing stall warnings when the angle of attack became so high (due to the pilots' crazy actions) that it thought it was erroneous.
Had the computer been in full control, AF447 would probably never have crashed.
3) auto deaths generally - but not always - include pedistrian deaths which can inflate the number 10-15%
4) air deaths do not generally include people killed by airplanes (9/11) only the passengers
I don't think the victims of the Oklahoma City bombing were counted as road deaths, even though the bomb was in a van. On the other hand, people killed on the ground during the Concorde crash in Paris CDG were counted as victims. Some of your arguments are flawed.
Shifting job hours can indeed be beneficial, but most employers won't allow it (this does not apply to Elon, though).
BTW, Westlake Village to El Segundo must have been a horrible drive to do every day. Happy for you that you don't do it anymore, really.
I still find the money would be better invested in expanding the rail/subway network. How many lanes can you add to a freeway before it becomes ridiculously dangerous? There are already 17 lanes on some sections of the I-5 over here...
I did not step out in front of a moving car, I stepped out 100 yards from a moving car. When you are on a main street and there is a secondary street with a stop sign crossing the street you are on, do you stop to make sure that car 100 yards away from the stop sign will indeed stop?
And on what planet do you live where there are parked cars and/or trees on the whole length of pedestrian crossings? Traffic must not be very fluid.
My point is, I am tired of this category of drivers who don't give a shit about anything or anybody but themselves and make the road a dangerous place. The worse part is that they partly act like that to keep pedestrians, bicycles etc away from the streets because they are too selfish to share them with anybody else.
I was sober. I did look carefully before crossing and saw the car about 100 yards away. Considering its speed, the driver had plenty of time to stop by braking only mildly. Actually he could probably have reduced his speed without stopping and I would have had more than enough time to cross. But he thought he was such a great driver that he did not actually need to keep his eyes on the road at all time, but it was ok to change a CD or dial a phone number or whatever other stupid crap he did not really dare to deny.
Plus, it happened in a country where cars must yield to pedestrians about to engage on a crossing in all cases. A pedestrian crossing is like a yield sign for cars over here.
So the only thing I did wrong is assuming the driver would yield, since he had plenty of time to do so and there was no reason at all for not seeing me.
Now stop pulling dumb statistics out of your ass to try to tell me that I am at fault.
Yes, it DID happen to me 2 years ago. I got a broken foot and I couldn't walk or drive for two months (and I consider myself lucky). But of course, you don't care because you are a REAL man who only drives a 5000-lbs pickup, so you are not at risk.
And BTW, why are you so obsessed by the Prius? Is it because its main advantage is fuel efficiency, and thus your manhood is threatened?