While it's good to say ignore everything that doesn't live up to standards, it's not always possible. I had, for instance, set Foxit as our company's default PDF reader, due to it being 1) much faster than Adobe Reader, and 2) not automatically susceptible to the same vulnerabilities as Adobe Reader (which were multitude, and well known and exploited in the wild). When HR set us up with ADP, however, this was forcibly changed: anyone trying to look at their electronic pay statements just got a big red X.
ADP stated this was because they actively block everything other than Adobe Reader's browser plugin (no option to download it). Their reason? Security.
Try to change their mind. It will be like pissing into the wind.
I left Windows due to the impending atrocity that was Vista combined with the road to nowhere that XP was heading on; Microsoft's excessively bad behavior toward the competition and with regards to open standards that seemed to only get worse; to escape vendor lock-in and the inevitable DRM before it got worse; for the security benefits of a UNIX or UNIX-like OS and for more power and control over my machine; as well as to escape having to plop a few hundred dollars down for an OS upgrade (especially when they consist of such duds as Windows ME, Vista and Windows 8). I don't regret it.
Vista was terrible, but in a sense, it was necessary terrible. They broke the way things worked to fix the problems plaguing windows since forever (note: I'm not defending Vista, it was a pile of crap; it did introduce some great technology, though, which is great in its successor).
As for their stance towards open standards, I never thought I'd see the day, but for a change, they are actually getting better with them. Much better.
And with 8, I actually think it is a really good OS. They just needed to either leave out or give an option to bypass the Metro start screen and use the classic Start Menu. Otherwise, it is an incredible upgrade to 7. If only they had that ability to natively get past Metro, I might have actually introduced it to my network. Until they do that, though, I'm not incurring additional training costs for a crappy tablet interface, just for the (admittedly really nice) enhancements in the rest of the OS.
Mind you, I'm not trying to troll you; I'm happy for you that you've managed to escape them. I often wish I had been able to, but I really don't have a choice in the matter (my career pretty much depends on them right now). Just trying to point out that it's not all crap over on this side.
Just turn off the plugin, download PDFs and open them automatically with the reader. That'll even run smoother for both applications, and you get all the reader features instead of a subset.
Except that some sites only display PDFs through the plugin (which I think is silly, but when it's your payroll site, you don't have a choice in the matter). This also ignores the fact that Flash and Silverlight only run as plugins (yes, I know there are ways to download them and run them locally, but frankly, most people (myself included) really don't want to bother with that, as it is a pain in the ass).
If I had to install and use Vista again, I would turn off UAC. I've left it on in 7. I use the same programs in both, and I can't stand how noisy it is in Vista.
UAC was a really good idea that was executed badly in its first iteration, which is a common theme with Microsoft. They fixed its issues.
The full statement should really be "Redundancy costs money and lack of redundancy costs a lot more money". There is an old saying; you can pay me a little now or a lot later. By definition a critical system is one where the company will lose a lot of money if it goes down and it eventually will. The short sighted decision to not have redundancy is usually a bad one.
This is very true; however, most businesses don't see past the "Redundancy costs money" part, and get caught up in the short-term price rather than looking to the long term one.
Also, saying all of that wasn't quite as pithy as I was shooting for, so...
My first question would be what is a non-redundant fiber interface doing at such a critical link? To me that is poor system design.
The answer? "Redundancy costs money."
Showing my ignorance... What about virtualization. I've not done any tinkering with this but can one not run XP or even DOS in a virtual machine hosted by a 64 bit OS?
This can absolutely be done; since any consumer grade 64 bit processor will run a 32 bit OS just fine, the virtualization software doesn't even need to emulate a 32 bit processor, so it is very easy to do. VirtualBox does everything you should want or need at an end-user lever for small scale virtualization like that...I use it all the time and highly recommend it. Plus, it's free.
What will you do when MS ends its support on Windows XP?
Based on past experience, probably complain that Microsoft is trying to force upgrades down people's throats. It's so unethical how they choose not to support every piece of software they wrote until the end of time, you know.
If they included those features in home edition, who would want to buy the more expensive professional edition? It's called price discrimination: The business technique of making sure every customer pays as close as possible to what they are willing to pay, even if customers are willing to pay different amounts.
The features that are included in Pro are much more complex than simply saying "it has AD...". Those parts are maintained by an entire separate team, which costs more money. Since they have to pay devs to maintain both Windows itself and the AD components for Pro, but just the Windows parts for Home, it makes since to change extra. They also have to meet higher standards for reliability, and with integrating into the network at a much larger and complex scale in Pro, otherwise business would not buy. I don't think it is price discrimination to charge your customers only for the parts they use, but charge for all the parts they use.
Dammit...why did you have to put me in a position to defend MS?