Well, People generally comment on this site that basic research can lead to unexpected outcomes, new questions. It's entirely possible that all of this data can help support something new that we haven't thought of yet. I understand that this isn't basic research, but I feel that it could be applied here.
I've heard that people put one above and below the tongue to look like they have a tongue piercing. The swallowing could just be accidental. Not sure if it works for the tongue, but I've seen it work with ear lobes.
Well, now that the Charles River is, I believe, the cleanest water way in an urban city in the world, then other smells start to get noticed more.
Of course Poison ivy is tasty... for 5 minutes... once.
Eh, don't worry about the movie reference. Nobody is looking at that since everybody is now looking at your combination of a and lot to one word.
Thank you for posting that! I've never forgotten the visual of that teacher with the Einstein hair clapping his hands.
Could this be used to help identify a user before allowing access to a computer? Iris scan, fingerprint scan THEN you must french kiss your computer juuuust right. Or an updated form of captcha for websites, just thinking...
Checking back on this thread has made me think a little about being a bit more fair about viewing this topic, but you are now the second person that has remarked on the tattoo by his eye as a tear drop. Let's be clear that it is the start of a SCAR tattoo that wasn't covered up by the makeup. Now, if it was left visible because it was too close to the eye for makeup to cover then that's one thing, but if it was done intentionally so members of the jury would mistake it as a tear to evoke some sympathy, then I'm back to feeling how I was in the beginning. Cover it up or don't.
No one forced him to get those tattoos and he's not looking to have them permanently removed. So I'd say they are part of him, part of his persona and should be shown to the jury.
So does that mean Dick Cheney can finally shoot people in the face and more easily get away with it claiming that "I was just trying to save the guy"?
Until you have a baby. None of these kind of comments will be funny anymore. Seriously.
So what? You want to be one of the first 3 people that got a star in the forehead and now are dead? yes, he gets hogtied ina matter of minutes but you are still dead. That's what.
I think the meaning behind the future winner angle was that this guy is probably stupid enough to do something like this again, AND THEN kill himself, thereby gaining one Darwin Award.
Do you realize just how crazy it is that we've NEVER BEEN BACK to the moon?