for thepiratebay.org

HTTP/1.1 302 Found Location: http://assets.virginmedia.com/site-blocked.html Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

Then on the page you redirect too:

HTTP/1.1 304 Not Modified Server: Apache/2.2.15 (Red Hat) Last-Modified: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:35:14 GMT Cache-Control: max-age=4600, public Expires: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:36:23 GMT Vary: Accept-Encoding Content-Encoding: gzip Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Accept-Ranges: bytes Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:39:31 GMT X-Varnish: 2120962236 2120363846 Age: 25388 Via: 1.1 varnish Connection: keep-alive X-Varnish-Cache: HIT

while i agree this would represent a cost saving potentially - i think you would be missing some key benefits though? smaller, lighter plans - with no "meat and bones" inside to protect ( im thinking G forces, ejection seats ). These planes should be able to maneuver like no other - retrofitting a current plane would probably entail cutting back on some of these benefits?

does this law exist in America? i know we have it here in the UK - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incitement_to_ethnic_or_racial_hatred

I imagine after being asked NOT to attend, they will be FAR more interested in attending.

yeah, i also dropped the word "be" too :)

ever get the feeling Google is just throwing crap at the wall to see what sticks? i mean, im not try to suggest their products arent good ( ive got the nexus 10 which is great ) - but they seem to at a stage of being reactive in the industry and if something doesnt make enough of a bang, they can it.

if i read the article, could i be accused of ''procuring information to commit Islamic extremist explosive attacks with remote-controlled model airplanes,' - i mean, if they go into detail about what was planned..... oh oh! they could even say "ive downloaded it onto my computer" with the cunning use of a cache.

this is exactly what it comes down to... what are the customer requirements - and what level of accuracy is required - i don't see 100% being achievable. The thing that bothers me most about the article though is how superficially the author is looking at the problem. its like someone who's starting out in development - and really not taking into account a HUGE amount of factors which will come into play. even if you ignored all timezone requirements and just focused on keeping the clock in sync with the local server time - you've still got a difficult task to keep the hands with a high level of accuracy - anyone know how accurate JS timing is? setTimeout talks about ms..what if the device is under load? what if its a crappy browser on an old mobile phone?

agreed... at one point i was taking the article seriously ( although not agreeing with the conclusion ) and then i read the whole "you could buy X ipads" and i thought...WTF??? one minute we're talking about office machines that people use for work, the next we're talking about buying a lot of iPads?? that would certainly be a FAR more efficient waste of money for a large office. After everyone gets bored of the gimmicks and realises they have real work to do..they'd be shelved. the amount of times ive seen people comparing computers and the desktop market to tablets is starting to bore me. apples and oranges anyone?

http://www.three.co.uk/Discover/Phones/Goodbye_data_limits_Hello_Three ive used about 30GB one month! theyre cool with tethering too - so im sometimes away from home sharing the data to my laptop, ipad etc. good speed too...about 2mbit down

i own a galaxy note - and yes, its on the big side. but when anyone asks - i always say that the thing i now do LEAST on my phone, is phone! so for people who spend more time on the web, streaming films, playing games etc. then i think a big screen is perfect - and i agree with another poster - people vote with their wallets - and larger screen phones are being purchased in huge numbers. i personally think if apple brought out a phone with a large ( over 4 inch ) screen with a great battery they'd be onto a winner! FYI - i'm on a phone contract in the UK, that gives truly unlimited data ( no fair usage caps ) - so a large screen, plus netflix = great!

agree with this. im the one who actually does the "work", and believe it or not, require some focus to do this. if every message that i currently receive as an email came through as a phonecall, my productivity would drop. i would no longer be able to focus on work, then take some time to focus on following up emails between tasks. however, i guess, from the client point of view - they just want to find something out striaght away, so i can see why they would see it as more efficient to get an immediate answer with a phonecall. it feels like two different types of workers.... like project managers vs. programmers ? ( just an example! :) )

and i work for atos... we've been focusing on using office communicator more often - this reduces the cost of conference calls, and allows for realtime chat - love the integration with outlook too - knowing if someone is currently available, if they're about to go into a meeting etc. i do however value email and its "audit trail" but i suppose theres enough paperwork outside of this, and technically, big decisions shouldn't only have an email backing it up?

this would make software extremely expensive to develop. isn't there just too many permutations of events in software to KNOW that its "100% done"? and will NEVER have an error/bug? not to mention the area of users themselves being the vulnerabilities...