Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Time to moon: 9.2 years (Score 1) 387

by jwink (#24203353) Attached to: Send the ISS To the Moon
Doesn't stability of a LaGrange point - keeping something in it - depend on the point in question? I think you have to fight drift more in L1 through L3, but not so much in L4 and L5.

Wikipedia has some good info on stability: Or listen to the AstronomyCast episode on LaGrange points: They describe L1 through L3 as trying to keep a marble on a saddle, but L4 and L5 as keeping a marble in a volcano - hard to get it up there, but somewhat stable once it's there.

It'd be neat if we could keep something in L4 or L5 of the Earth/Moon system, but I agree the costs to and from Earth or Moon are probably still too politically big...

+ - Review: MS Office Live Workspaces Misses the Mark->

Submitted by
iweditor writes "After an excruciatingly drawn-out development process, Microsoft's Office Live Workspaces — the company's attempt to marry Microsoft Office to the emerging Web services 'cloud' — is finally upon us. But it arrived in typical Microsoft fashion: eschewing current software-as-a-services trends. Oh, and it's boring as hell. Not only does OLW do nothing really new, it doesn't even do what it does as well as other, competing solutions do."
Link to Original Source

Put not your trust in money, but put your money in trust.