Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:future of perl? (Score 2, Insightful) 415

by junklight (#24807771) Attached to: The State of Scripting Languages

I love the fact that Perl fans always mention regexes but never mention the fact that in a subroutine you have to unpack your own parameters with the really so blindingly obvious '@_' .

Now I don't know about you but most of the things I write in Python are pretty damn big and regexes are a very small part compared to say *all the functions*

So can I live with slightly more complex regex *syntax* in return for the rest of the language having a syntax I don't need to think about?

(and yes there are perl dudes who know this stuff inside out - but *why* would a newcomer scale these ridiculous barriers to entry?)

"One Architecture, One OS" also translates as "One Egg, One Basket".

Working...