Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:best FF upgrade FAIL (Score 1) 383

by juggledean (#38000982) Attached to: Firefox 8.0 Released
I did the upgrade and received the notice that it won't work on my 10.4.11 Mac. Mozilla could have checked the useragent and known it wouldn't work and they could have posted something on the download page to tell me it wouldn't work but they didn't, until after I installed it.

Installation removed my working FF3.6.24. I backed it up but, for some reason, I can't move it back into the Applications folder. sudo cp -r {source} /Applications doesn't change the Applications directory.

So know I'm using Safari and lost all the plugins.

Does anyone know a way to go back to 3.6? I'm otherwise happy with the 10.4 macos.

Comment: Re:Why not repeat the genome sequencing? (Score 1) 123

by juggledean (#36567436) Attached to: Human Genome Contaminated With Mycoplasma DNA
The variances are what makes us different, one from another. Medical research is very interested in why some people get diseases and others do not. The 1000 Genomes Project was announced in 2008 and finished its pilot study last year http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1000_Genomes_Project

Comment: Re:Why not repeat the genome sequencing? (Score 1) 123

by juggledean (#36563876) Attached to: Human Genome Contaminated With Mycoplasma DNA

Well, my first response is, feel free to try it.

But remember the source material is one individual's genetic material. I believe in the original study they repeated the chemistry many times to be sure the findings were consistent. Assuming you can get this individual to give you some DNA why do you think it won't be contaminated as well. Remember that there are a large number of genes that have not been associated with some function. Personally I think it is more important to figure out what the proteins are doing and how they work together than worry about a 1% error in the bookkeeping.

Comment: 50 years of ephaptic transmission (Score 2) 287

by juggledean (#35117672) Attached to: Research Finds That Electric Fields Help Neurons Fire
Ephaptic transmission was a buzzword in the 1950-60's, just google it. Yes it can be demonstrated to exist but it is way out of the mainstream.

In pre-digital telephones there was a phenomenon called crosstalk where you could here faintly and sporadically someone else's conversation. Imagine if you were studying the phone system to try and discover how the city or country "thinks". Would you spend a lot of time analyzing the crosstalk?

Oh, and notice that this research was done in brain slices, Perhaps the effects are even less prominent in intact brains.

Comment: Re:Evolutionary perspective (Score 1) 223

by juggledean (#34025484) Attached to: You Have Taste Receptors In Your Lungs

From the abstract, it's a Calcium-activated Potassium channel (BK) that leads to the smooth muscle relaxation.

agonist > TAS2R (a GPCR) > Gaq > plB > IP3 > ^Ca++ > open BK > hyperpolarization > close voltage-sensitive CaV channels > relaxation

Maybe this study explains the action of Vick's Vapor Rub or the eucalyptus oil ingredient.

Never say you know a man until you have divided an inheritance with him.

Working...