typodupeerror

## Comment: Re:Soulskill is a wee-todd. Title written by moron (Score 1)101101

Thanks for the explanation.

I did generalize it, assuming that any orbit with a 24h period is geostationary. Perhaps that was ill advised :)

Heh. Especially if you're going the wrong way.

## Comment: Re:Soulskill is a wee-todd. Title written by moron (Score 1)101101

Infinite set? I thought that 'geostationary orbit' meant an orbit only at a specific distance, only around the equator. What am I missing? What other orbits would be geostationary?

## Comment: Not just microbiome studies (Score 4, Insightful)5353

Those 5 questions should be asked of pretty much every scientific study done, no matter what the field

## Comment: Re:Where's the queue? (Score 3, Funny)420420

So you're planning to hitchhike to Tau Ceti? You do know it's off season and the hotel rates are insane? You don't even want to know what a Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster will set you back.

A properly made Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster will set you back into infancy, no matter what the season.

## Comment: Defies the diffraction limit of light? (Score 1)3939

Can someone explain what they mean about defying the diffraction limit of light? How can that be?

## Comment: Re:Distance remains the same? (Score 1)182182

Assuming the sun as at the center of the ellipse - which I believe it isn't in this case. So it's right roughly once a year.

Actually, depending on how big the ellipse is compared with the circle with a 1 AU radius, it could be right from 0 times (circle way too big, or way too small), to as many as 4. Play around with an ellipse and a circle centered at one focus and you'll see what I mean. As the relative sizes change, the number of times it's right changes too. Thank god we got *that* straightened out.

## Comment: Re:it's own antiparticle? (Score 2)128128

OK, thanks. That makes some sort of sense (in the "I don't understand the math" kind of way). So what's the difference between two particles meeting and a single particle by itself? The former is the same as the latter, just double the amount, right?

## Comment: Re:it's own antiparticle? (Score 1)128128

But, neutrons have no electric charge and there's such a thing as an anti-neutron. What am I missing here?

## Comment: it's own antiparticle? (Score 2)128128

From one of the articles: "a particle that is its own anti-particle" Can one of the physics geeks on here explain how that works? I was under the impression that when particle and antiparticle meet, they go boom. How can this thing not annihilate? Or is it that this bit of matter *can't* turn into energy? The wikipedia entry on this didn't make any sense to me.

## + - Google pushes to open public records

AlHunt writes: "The perennial favorite love/hate company, Google, "is helping state governments make reams of public records that are now unavailable or hard to find online" and according to CNN, "records will not be exclusive to the search engines owned by Google, Yahoo and Microsoft." Meanwhile, privacy advocates are up in arms "cautioning that some records may contain personal and confidential information that should not be widely available."."

That does not compute.

Working...