An RF image of someone in their home is not invading their privacy.

I don't see what's so bad about this?

MS is already known for it's shit OS, this just comes across as a dick move with no real different to microsofts rep.

In typical hollywood fashion, the CDC seems to be more concerned with creating an image of no panic when they don't have a clue. Everything they have done so far has been reactionary. You don't have a plan if all you do is react to events. No fly list should have been in place. Isolate then test should have been in place. Seems a lot of things aren't there but they keep telling the public how great their plan is.

CEOs with no imagination do layoffs. Nayda is a terrible CEO, nothing he has done so far impresses me.

The west must go all out on sanctions. Gonna happen sooner or later.. and later is always bad.

I got too old for this shit

if someone gives you a percentage they are trying to make it better or worse than it actually is.

lol

How is voiding the warranty threat show they are taking security seriously? Everyone puts a voids the warranty warning when they don't want you to see whats inside. IF someone hacks your car is the warranty still void?

His answer seems to mean it wouldn't be his preference, rather than being impossible.

Maybe obscurity doesn't mater after all

It's free. 30 years down the road no one can claim a patent on it. Just let food grow naturally, stop this super this super that crap.

How so? Requiring one party to pay 200,000 euros to operate a taxi while not enforcing that on another party is not competition. That privileged access is a requirement from the government itself.

10 years ago someone said...

"Opensource will eliminate all bugs, because the world can see the source". Doesn't matter if no one reads the source.