Comment: Re:Me too? (Score 0) 290
An RF image of someone in their home is not invading their privacy.
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
Comment: And this is bad because? (Score 0) 290
I don't see what's so bad about this?
Comment: how does this hurt microsoft? (Score -1, Flamebait) 629
MS is already known for it's shit OS, this just comes across as a dick move with no real different to microsofts rep.
Comment: CDC more concerned about PR (Score 1) 381
In typical hollywood fashion, the CDC seems to be more concerned with creating an image of no panic when they don't have a clue. Everything they have done so far has been reactionary. You don't have a plan if all you do is react to events. No fly list should have been in place. Isolate then test should have been in place. Seems a lot of things aren't there but they keep telling the public how great their plan is.
Comment: A terrible CEO (Score 0) 109
CEOs with no imagination do layoffs. Nayda is a terrible CEO, nothing he has done so far impresses me.
Comment: Give them Crimea they said.. (Score 1) 848
The west must go all out on sanctions. Gonna happen sooner or later.. and later is always bad.
Comment: Too old (Score 3, Funny) 146
I got too old for this shit
Comment: A rule of thumb.. (Score 3, Interesting) 137
if someone gives you a percentage they are trying to make it better or worse than it actually is.
Comment: only 138,469 people? (Score 1) 382
lol
Comment: Void warranty (Score 4, Interesting) 77
How is voiding the warranty threat show they are taking security seriously? Everyone puts a voids the warranty warning when they don't want you to see whats inside. IF someone hacks your car is the warranty still void?
Comment: Why impossible? (Score 1) 250
His answer seems to mean it wouldn't be his preference, rather than being impossible.
Comment: OpenSSL disagrees (Score 2) 51
Maybe obscurity doesn't mater after all
Comment: What's wrong with normal bananas? (Score 2) 396
It's free. 30 years down the road no one can claim a patent on it. Just let food grow naturally, stop this super this super that crap.
Comment: Re:Competition Sucks (Score 1) 507
How so? Requiring one party to pay 200,000 euros to operate a taxi while not enforcing that on another party is not competition. That privileged access is a requirement from the government itself.
Comment: Re:This is awesome (Score 3, Insightful) 217
The more of these we find, the more secure OpenSSL will be. I hope we continue to find these kinds of problems and see them fixed. If open source has one strength, it's that when many skilled eyes DO converge on the code it can be tested and fixed far more quickly than a corporation with limited resources and only paid developers can do the same sort of debugging work. The trick is getting the eyes there in the first place.
10 years ago someone said...
"Opensource will eliminate all bugs, because the world can see the source". Doesn't matter if no one reads the source.
