Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Deal of the Day - Pay What You Want for the Learn to Code Bundle, includes AngularJS, Python, HTML5, Ruby, and more. ×

Comment Re:I'll believe it when I see it (Score 1) 48

And yet for all your misdirected Windows whining DirectX for Windows is the only area that AMD cards perform well. Their Linux drivers blow, as noted by other posts here, and that is because AMD can't write OpenGL drivers to save their life.

nVidia, on the other hand, has extremely fast and solid drivers for Linux.

Comment Well of course, because Linux is OpenGL (Score 1) 48

And AMD can't handle OpenGL. I don't know why, I'm not sure what's so hard, I'm not sure if there's a monster that guards the OpenGL specs in the AMD office or something, but they have sucked at GL for over a decade, and show no signs of getting any better. They can't claim it is because of an API limitation either. For whatever you want to say about the mess that is OpenGL, nVidia makes their GL drivers dead even with their DX drivers. You can use either rendering path and can't tell the difference in features or speed.

That is also why I'm real skeptical that Vulkan is going to do anything for AMD. While they are heavily involved in the development, they are involved with OpenGL's development too (ATi was a voting member on the ARB and is a promoter with Khronos Group). Given that Vulkan is heavily GL based, originally being named glNext, I worry that AMD will suck at performance with it as well.

Comment I'll believe it when I see it (Score 2, Insightful) 48

Not the driver, that's out, but that they are going to change how they do drivers. They've said that numerous times before, and always the situation is the same. They are very slow at getting actual release drivers out (they are forever beta versions) and their OpenGL performance and support is garbage (to the point that HFSS would fail to run on systems with AMD cards).

So AMD: Less talk, more good drivers. I want to support you, I really do, but I've been burned too many times.

Comment And what does that cost for gigabit routing? (Score 1) 104

The problem PFSense has as compared to consumer routers is that running on normal Intel CPUs it needs more CPU power (and thus cost) to be able to forward a given amount of traffic. Plus all the NICs and such are separate silicon. Boradcom makes little all-in-one chips that have a couple of ARM cores that have acceleration for routing and so on. Also they have things like an ethernet switch and ethernet PHYs on the chip so they needn't be added. Have a look at a BCM4709A for an example that is popular in routers.

PFSense is good but it is not the most economical thing if you are talking features matching a consumer router, meaning gig routing, multiple ports, and wifi, you can have your costs go up a fair bit. Particularly if you also then want it to be fairly small and low power. If you hop over to PFSense's site it would cost about $575 for a SG-2440 with WiFi which would give features roughly on par with a consumer router.

While I'd much rather have that over a consumer router, a consumer router is in fact what I have because I didn't want to spend a ton of money for a home router.

Comment Re:This is the only answer that matters (Score 1) 373

There were two reasons I bought a PS3 back in the day:
1) Final Fantasy XIII -- OOOOPS. Epic fail there.
2) Sony seemed to be doing a good job of atoning for their past mistakes with DRM and rootkits... The PS3 did run Linux for a while after all, and even after the OtherOS fiasco, they were overall doing better. The PS3 was a fairly open or at least "standards-based" system - standard USB peripherals, mostly standard Bluetooth profiles. Overall, I think that under Kaz Hirai, Sony has for the most part been moving far away from their old shenanigans of old. (Of interest: Sony's previous CEO rose up through their media/film divisions. Hirai rose up through the consumer electronics/computer entertainment division.)

I was quite happy with my PS3, which is why I went for the PS4 and I have no regrets. That said - if everyone I knew gamed on Xbox One and I played more multiplayer games than just Destiny, I would consider an Xbox. (I basically played no multiplayer games prior to Destiny, and have overall been lucky to find enough friends that play it on either console to find people on the same console I own.)

Comment This is the only answer that matters (Score 5, Informative) 373

If this is for the kids, then they need to make the choice. Mostly because online play tends to only work in console. So if all their friends have an Xbox one and they have a PS4, then they can't play games together.

If you want any kind of technical considerations or the like the PS4 is faster than the Xbone because of details with hardware design so it will end up rendering things at a higher resolution and so on. Also the controllers feel very different in the hands, and some people have a strong preference. I like the Xbone controllers much better and they are what I use with my PC (I have a PS4 controller as well).

Really though what matters is choosing the one that has the games you want, and that plays with the people you want to play with. The rest is secondary.

Comment Re:Data data everywhere and not a drop to think (Score 4, Insightful) 366

The real story behind $10,000 hammers you hear people joke about in defense & aerospace:

It's a $500 hammer because it's made from premium materials and is designed to handle things most hammers in civilian use would never see, plus $9,500 worth of government-mandated paperwork proving you didn't rip off the government.

Comment Re:Data data everywhere and not a drop to think (Score 2) 366

I've never seen a flight where they were threatening bumping that they weren't gate-checking bags because every seat was full and there wasn't enough room for carryons.

(Not weight reduction here - bag was still on the plane, just in cargo instead of overhead bins in the passenger compartment.)

Comment Re:Heterogeneous Memory FTW (Score 1) 22

It's too bad that despite the chip not being much more expensive (as evidenced by the fact that TX1 consumer products are reasonably priced - the TX1-based Shield ATV is $199 including a controller, the TK1-based Shield Tablet was $299, and $100+ for battery/display makes a lot of sense) or around the same price, the TX1 dev board is 3 times the price of the TK1 dev board. (Jetson TK1 was $192).

I was really hoping for a successor to the Jetson TK1 that used the X1, but this isn't really a successor - despite a different name it's clearly a completely different animal.

Comment Sigh (Score 5, Insightful) 518

Another person who doesn't understand the first amendment. The first amendment says that the government can't mess with your free expression. They can't put you in jail because you say something they don't like, they can't shut down a news paper for reporting on things they don't want, and so on. It does NOT say that people have to listen to whatever you say, like it, and not respond in any way.

This guy didn't have his rights violated at all: He said something extremely stupid, and people then used their first amendment rights to express that he's a jackass. His political party decided that because he'd pissed off lots of voters, they weren't interested in supporting them. They aren't required to support anyone, the choose the candidates they like. He realized he'd fucked up, and had no chance of wining, and so withdrew.

Nothing improper here. You seem to think that the first amendment should mean speech without consequence. Of course that doesn't work without infringing on the rights of others. If you say something I don't like, I have to be free to say I don't like you for it, or my freedom of speech is being infringed upon. I have to be free to refuse to talk to you, do business with you, etc or my freedom of association is being infringed upon.

Comment It's also rather hard to believe it would work (Score 5, Insightful) 223

Ultrasonic response is not something most devices are good at. We, unsurprisingly, tend to design your sound systems around what we can hear. Particularly when you are talking cheaper equipment the high frequency response of speakers and microphones is often not very impressive. There's also the issue that the digital audio compression we use for things, like TV broadcasts, deemphasizes high frequencies.

So for this to work they need:

1) A TV broadcast with sufficient audio bitrate to get their high frequency signal encoded (the AC-3 streams usually used in ATSC broadcasts can be any bitrate from 64kbps to 448kbps).

2) Encoded in such a way by the broadcaster that the high frequencies are preserved to a sufficient amount that their signal isn't distorted.

3) Reproduced by speakers good enough to produce their signal, but to do it at a sufficient level to be picked up (speakers roll off at more extreme frequencies).

4) Picked up by a microphone with sufficient range to be able to receive such a signal and isn't being occluded too much be being in a pocket or something.

5) Processed by a program running on the device, that has control of the microphone at the time the signal is playing.

Ya... While that isn't impossible, that is not likely to work any real amount of time. To have any good chance of working you'd probably have to push the signal down in to the audible range, which would of course piss people off to hear spurious high frequency noise. Likewise for it to be of any use the user would need to have an app on their device that is running. The mic doesn't magically record everything that comes in and store it for anything to access. A program has to be running and take control of the microphone to be able to get any input from it.

This sounds like an advertiser pipe dream, not something that has been tried with real technology in realistic settings.

People seem to think that ultrasonic communication is some kind of magic. It isn't. I mean it can be done, no question, you can encode information in sound, and you can do it in sound frequencies above human hearing. However that doesn't mean you can do it with any arbitrary device, or under arbitrary conditions.

Comment Grumble grumble... (Score 1) 84

The Jetson TK1 sold for $192.

I was really looking forward to a Tegra X1 version of the Jetson, but not at $599 and not at 6+ months after the chipset started appearing in consumer products at a significantly lower price.

(The Jetson TK1 was the first K1 device to launch and was priced similar to or below fully assembled consumer products like the SHIELD Tablet.)

Comment Re:How about NO (Score 1) 125

Intel CPUs fully support 16-bit mode still. Look it up. What they don't support is going to VM86 while in Long Mode which leads to the old WoW system not working for 16-bit support.

There is just no need to sandbox 32-bit support, since it works great how it is. If you are interested, go and read about how WoW64 works and how Compatibility Mode inside Long Mode (on the CPUs) works. It allows for 32-bit software to execute in a 64-bit system with no fuss, and it is something people highly value.

Also again, do more research. You are jerking hard at the knee: Hyper-V -IS- included with Windows. Comes with every copy of pro, you just turn it on. Further if you think something like XP mode is a good solution you are kidding yourself. Now you have a virtual OS which doesn't get updated because it is no longer supported and is an easy vector for attacks. That copy of XP in XP mode is a full OS, and thus has the attack profile of any XP system out there.

Seriously, you really, really need to go and do some research on this topic if you care about it as much as you seem to. It isn't a simple situation of "just virtualize it" nor is a 32-bit compatibility layer the massive problem you make it out to be. You have a bunch of bits and pieces of facts, but a lot of misinformation filling it in.

Comment How about NO (Score 4, Insightful) 125

If you want a platform that breaks older shit, well then go ahead and find one. However many of us would like our software to keep working. WoW64 has been a great success because 32-bit apps run seamlessly and very fast. So you can just use whatever software you want. This has made widespread 64-bit adoption possible. If suddenly 80+% of your programs stop working because there's no compatibility layer, people just won't want to use it. Many, many programs these days are still 32-bit. You may not like that or agree with the choice, but it is what it is. I want to be able to run my software, I don't care about ideological purity.

Also you might want to do your research a bit better, VirtualPC -IS- back. It's called Hyper-V now and it is MS's all encompassing virtualization solution. You can have it on the desktop all the way up to big clusters of servers.

"Help Mr. Wizard!" -- Tennessee Tuxedo