Comment: show us one good software patent (Score 5, Insightful) 209
Has the USPTO presented specific examples of what they consider to be excellent software patents?
That should help focus discussion...
|
|
If Huawei's code requires anything more than generic gcc, Australia may not be able to verify 100% security, regardless... unless they're given the source code to the compiler as well.
That wouldn't help, since the compiler recognizes its own source as well, and puts the compiler backdoor in the resulting compiler executable. So the bad compiler source code is only needed initially to create a compromised compiler executable, and can be cleaned up afterwards.
PL/I -- "the fatal disease" -- belongs more to the problem set than to the solution set. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra, SIGPLAN Notices, Volume 17, Number 5