You also have to consider that the US has a long way to go before its even remotely competitive with China, if we're talking about total tons of CO2. They produce 2x what we do, and that's not including how much they breathe - which puts it more like 4-5x the total of what the US produces, for both India and China.

That's largely dependent on relative oxygen concentration in the air, which is the biggest reason indoor air quality is poor/low in oxygen - not CO2 directly. CO2 is the second order issue.

These are generally people with poor cardiovascular health in the first place.

With higher oxygen levels (as naturally happens with increased CO2) due to increased plant growth, people will/are able to withstand much more CO2 before its problematic.

Don't be silly. If you wore a mask during covid as all the doctors said you must to flatten the curve, you were breathing 2000-5000ppm CO2 all day long.

Meanwhile, that's about half of the low end of what plants prefer - 800-1200ppm.

Their alarmism about (the 180ppm) of the last Ice Age, meanwhile, was almost low enough to kill all plantlife on the planet (and with it, most animal species that depend on said plants). We were dangerously close to global annihilation.

For context, 1000ppm is going to be a stuffy office space, and 800ppm a well ventilated indoor space.

A well-fitted surgical mask like so many medical professionals insisted was necessary some short years ago? Those have been measured to result in a CO2 of 2,000-5,000 (with peaks up to 8,000ppm when its actually fit properly) for the air being inhaled. (But don't worry, that's still under the 8,000ppm 8-hour OSHA maximum.)

If plants like CO2, they're going to grow more rapidly and prolifically. That means, in turn, they'll be producing a lot more oxygen. Let's assume a moderate increase in O2 to 25% ambient... which is more than safe, and even preferable. The result would be that humans could withstand significantly higher CO2 ppm.

I'm not sure why we've ever started talking about CO2 as a "greenhouse gas" when it's 0.0425% of our atmosphere, and the facts above (about it causing significant greening of the planet). That much is well established, and it's well accepted that greening an area will decrease, not increase, the temperature of the area. We've seen this play out significantly in the last decade or so in eg. North Africa. This more than offsets the "global warming".

More CO2 is not only not bad - its beneficial and preferable.

The big problem with the CO2 hysteria (such as in the OP) is that it's myopic and agenda driven. "You've got to consume less" - which is true, regardless, but bellies the point that such propaganda is directed at Western countries which produce both less CO2 per capita and in total vs countries like India and China, which have effectively zero efforts in place to reduce its production. It's clearly aimed at the Western countries to hamper them economically. Outside factors, like solar output, are never considered in these breathless press releases about global warming. Notice how "global warming" is conveniently replaced with "climate change" in the media during periods of low solar output? We're now nearing the peak of the ~11 year solar cycle with the solar maximum likely to occur this year. Expect seeing more "global climate change" in the news in the coming years...

The rumor I've heard from those who work at Apple or have worked at Apple is that Apple bit way, way too hard into the rotten apple which was/is DEI. They promoted and hired people completely unfit for the jobs simply because or their DEI checkmark credentials. This has had disastrous impact on "softer" disciplines specifically, like project/program management, release management, and so on - nevermind more creative/artistic disciplines.

You can see this in how milquetoast a lot of their later software releases have been, and how they fall short of being meaningful improvements or something a person would even be able to conceptualize a use for - like Apple Intelligence. The message/notification summaries are nice, yes - but beyond that, it's a nothingburger. iPhone Mirroring? Slow and inconsistent (while the more useful clipboard sharing feature is... intermittently broken, it seems.) Desktop widgets? Who even looks at their desktop?

So, I'd not be surprised if the result is this. The internal projects have been stagnant or making negative progress to useless people of one stripe or color, and they can't simply get rid of them outright. But they still need to deliver something for shareholders, so absent a new hardware release they need something to show for the money spent on fancy offices.

Depends on whether you buy video games for video game gameplay or high polygon ray traced titties.

Yep. I can't see why you'd want this over, say, a 2020 M1 with 16GB of RAM.... at 2/3 or less the price. NPU capabilities? In most cases, I can't see it mattering at all.

Great - much more successful. No disagreement.

Now look at the cost of a Saturn V. It's much more.

"I suppose it could be less expensive, but is it really?"

It is. Just look at ROI and per-launch cost for SpaceX vs. all competitors. For SpaceX, most of the cost is in fuel.

Well there's your problem. That's astoundingly low.

Did you check to find out what the expected pay is for a software developer is in your state? That's astoundingly low - about $30-60k beneath the average for almost every state in the US for new hires in 2025, and someone who's skilled in what you're asking for with 5+ years experience should be right at that $140-160k average for each state. That's a change of about 20k from 2020 (ie under inflationary rate).

The figures you're offering are reasonable for pre-covid 2020 or so in the Midwest for someone with 1-2 years experience, from what I've seen. $70k would've been the expected starting wage for someone in states like SD or WY with a 4-year technical degree in a technical field.

No wonder you're only getting useless people.

Or - are you not listing salary on the job posting?

When I was hiring earlier this year for what amounts to a traveling datacenter technician with Linux experience, every single candidate had some combination of developer skills, BI/AI experience, and 5+ years of systems administration experience. About half of them met my requirements and it came down to finding someone with the best personality fit and skills outsized for the position which I could use to grow my team. The pay wasn't great ($80-110k - basically entry level for anywhere doing anything in the software industry) because it was a very tightwadded company, and we were hiring nationally. Long story short: there's no shortage of good applicants when you're paying a competitive industry rate.

In your case, you're looking for a very specifically scoped, niche skillset and want to pay them well under what they're likely making now. You're either going to get applicants who're punching up significantly, or people who're desperate (in which case, nerves come into play significantly in an interview).

I think you should adjust your expectations and/or pay.

This is true for almost all the other sites, as well. LinkedIn certainly does it.

I have to think this is intentional boomer-satire.

Newspapers don't exist anymore, not functionally. They haven't for over a decade, and aren't relevant to anyone under 50. Most are now online-only. Tech jobs are not posted there - ever.

"Pound the pavement"? You mean past the biometric double factor authentication required to get into the building and onto the business's floor? Or do you recommend climbing the building and rappelling down the building?

"Call a company or organization" - there's this thing called LinkedIn, it's been status quo for over a decade... nobody shares their numbers, or even has business numbers available anymore unless you work with them directly. Most people will not answer a call from an unknown number.

This is the reasonable approach to this, but I suspect the way that LLMs work makes it difficult if not prohibitive.

Oh, so I can {checks notes} do the same kinds of things I actively block and avoid, like take polls and watch ads, in order to have to search for content amongst a sea of monetized garbage?

No thanks.

Can I ask what level developer you're hiring for, and what you're paying? That might be why you appear to be only getting Indian scammer applicants.