Comment: Prior art? (Score 2, Insightful) 215
Apple sure does like to patent stuff they didn't invent.
Apple sure does like to patent stuff they didn't invent.
Quite the answer I was aiming for, here. I have to agree with you.
I'm just asking. Trying to get informed. Nothing more.
There's more to life than chocolate...
http://wwwdelivery.superstock.com/WI/223/1848/PreviewComp/SuperStock_1848-119945.jpg
Thank you. Someone ought to mod you informative.
The problem was the presumption that I'm criminalizing anything when I just made a question about a property of a substance. I don't do chocolate, coffee or tobacco because I chose not to. I'm not a fan of any of them. Not because I'm a puritan, which I'm not, those are simply stuff out of the list of things that I do.
I didn't even complain about any taxes. I didn't blindly reject any kind of pleasure the world has to offer. And I did not impose anything on anyone. I just made a (so I thought) funny comment about those three substances and in return I got a speach about complaints on taxes and asking me if I condemn the consumption of chocolate, tobacco or coffee. I didn't even express any opinion about marijuana or any kind of substance at all. So, yes, the comment made by the AC was ridiculous. And yours just went further in that direction when you implied that I was trying to impose behaviours or opinions on others. It was never, even remotely, the case.
No, it's just how context flows. If I ask about something, I expect a reply about that. It is because I want to know about what I asked. Period.
Sir, you don't even deserve an answer.
I'm giving you this sarcasm instead.
But then again neither is smoking tobacco, drinking alcohol, or chocolate for that matter.
I woudn't know. I don't do any of that stuff either.
That answer seems to be a bit misdirected...
"If the code and the comments disagree, then both are probably wrong." -- Norm Schryer