Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:eBook pricing (Score 1) 437

by jgs (#33691442) Attached to: E-Books Are Only 6% of Printed Book Sales

So are you saying that you wouldn't ever rent bits under any circumstances, for example even if the rental was openly deemed to be such and the "return" (i.e., removal of the bits from your storage) were based on the honor system? Because I for one wouldn't find such an arrangement problematic.

Or are you saying that you're insulted by the miasma of pretense and deception that surrounds DRM?

Comment: Re:eBook pricing (Score 1) 437

by jgs (#33687938) Attached to: E-Books Are Only 6% of Printed Book Sales

However, I will not spend money on a book that will, in all likelihood in the future, not be accessible as I'll be damned if I'll buy something twice. I'll not buy at all rather than have to buy twice as DRM history has taught us is very likely.

I generally agree and follow the same practice. However, I'd consider buying ("licensing"?) DRM'd ebooks if their price reflected their reduced value. Essentially, any DRM'd media you "buy" is in effect a rental whose term is unpredictable. If the price of an ebook were, say, 10% to 20% of the corresponding paper book, that would reflect my perception of its value.

Comment: The micro-sim (Score 1) 492

by jgs (#31915956) Attached to: This Is Apple's Next iPhone

I'm really bummed about the micro-SIM. I'm accustomed to buying a local prepaid SIM when I travel abroad for a long time (jailbroken, unlocked iPhone of course). Until and unless micro-SIMs become commonplace, I guess that wouldn't be possible with this phone. AT&T might like that, but I sure don't.

Anyone know if there's a straightforward fix to this problem? (Can we skip all the "buy an Android phone instead" comments. You know what I mean.)

Comment: Re:second.kilometer (Score 2, Insightful) 137

by jgs (#29583059) Attached to: 100-Petabit Internet Backbone Coming Into View

Yes, the story headline is talking about something totally different. I mean, how do YOU read "100-Petabit Internet Backbone"? Most people would not interpret it to mean "15.5 Tbps delivered over 7000 km." (The headline error is repeated in TFA. Ironically if you click all the way through to the AlcaLu press release the headline is more accurate: "Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs announces new optical transmission record and breaks 100 Petabit per second kilometer barrier".)

I will grant you that optics geeks may find the bandwidth-distance metric familiar... but I continue to assert that [Inter]net geeks do not.

Comment: Re:second.kilometer (Score 4, Insightful) 137

by jgs (#29579905) Attached to: 100-Petabit Internet Backbone Coming Into View

Maybe old hat to you network engineers, but I was previously unfamiliar with "bits per second.kilometer".

Thanks for the info. No, this is not old hat to network engineers. I've never heard of it and I've been working in the industry for more years than I care to admit. I think it might be old hat to marketing people though, since it appears to be a classic BIG MARKETING NUMBER. Normal networking people would call 15.5 Tbps * 7000 km... 15.5 Tbps.

Maybe it's true that optics geeks really do use numbers this way, I dunno. But the fact it comes from an AlcaLu press release doesn't lend it a whole lot of credibility.

I am massively unimpressed by the headline on the Slashdot story. Maybe another article headlined "kdawson swallows inflated AlcaLu marketing fluff hook, line and sinker" would be in order?

Comment: Re:IP industry would rather you didn't know PD exi (Score 1) 100

by jgs (#29471409) Attached to: Amazon Delaying Public Domain Submissions On Kindle

Almost anything that is uploaded to the Kindle store that was based on a public domain work is no longer entirely public domain.

That may be, but the GP says that it potentially only takes a single DRM'd PD work to establish a legal use for DRM circumvention. If that's so, then "almost" isn't good enough for someone in the DRM business. If your goal is to execute this kind of legal hack, your first step would be to create and upload a work which you explicitly place into the public domain. That would seem to address your points.

Thrashing is just virtual crashing.