You can tell them the password is "EyE want @ lavvy3r". If you don't tell them how you obfuscated it, they'll never get in.
If I had to guess, I'd say heritable immunity.
const int one = 65536;
As an aside (that means off-topic, guys) this looks like part of a fixed-point arithmetic implementation. It may not be as silly as you think.
Those genes are not expressed, and we don't have copies of those viruses floating around our bloodstream.
Probably, and for the most part. But we used to think the genome was mostly "junk DNA" before we understood that much of it was homeotic in function. It seems to me that virus copies would not be conserved over time unless they were serving some function.
I worked at one of those background check companies for a while. It's amazing how much information people will give up for the chance of winning a contest, or even just asking.
The credit headers have some good information, but it's nothing in comparison to people filling out random forms for free shit.
I read that as "Second Life is over. Suicide is the only course of action left to you, sorry." well, either way.
database, dossier, file, list... anything would have been more accurate than "facebook". Hell, even if they compared it to Wikipedia, it would have been more accurate.
Facebook is full of user supplied information. The others are collections of information by 3rd parties. Maybe they were hoping for the keyword "facebook" to get their story more traffic. It got them here, so that should be good for at least a couple dozen clicks. That's the number of daily Slashdot users now, right?
That's going to work just as well as warranties.
"Oh my gosh, I can't void the warranty!"
"Oh my gosh, The FCC doesn't want me doing that!"
I wish them the best.
From Patrick himself...
"As long as it works, we'll include it."
I've always preferred LILO over Grub. It's simplicity has always been great.
There used to be a web page called "Your Eyes Suck at Blue". You might find it on the Wayback machine.
You can tell the luminance of each individual channel more precisely than you can perceive differences in mixed color. This is due to the difference between rod and cone cells. Your perception of the color gamut is, sorry, imprecise. I'm sure that you really can't discriminate 256 bits of blue in the presence of other, varying, colors.
"I'm not afraid of dying, I just don't want to be there when it happens." -- Woody Allen