The news is broken.
How about the news is imperfect like most things where humans are invovled. I follow a number of international and local main stream news outlets and as long as I use my critical thinking muscles, I feel like I get an acceptable version of what is happening in the world. In regard to your WaPo example, yes people reporting breaking news sometimes get it wrong (and sometimes very wrong) in the rush to get out the news. However, the errors are typically corrected promptly and the people who made the mistakes have black marks on their record. If these remedial actions are not taken, it's not a reliable news source.
By this logic, sit-ins etc are also violence. Its right to allow BLM protestors to be run down on the highway etc.
I just wanted to point out that the provincial police and RCMP went to great lengths to not instigate violence when dealing with the protestors.
This position basically amounts to - its "an attack on democracy" when I disagree, its "civil disobedience" when I do agree.
I hear what you're saying but I think you're oversimplifying what is going on here. There's a much more nuanced discussion to be had but this probably isn't the place.
"I'm not a god, I was misquoted." -- Lister, Red Dwarf