Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Note: You can take 10% off all Slashdot Deals with coupon code "slashdot10off." ×

Comment Re:Small tidbit (Score 1) 773

Maybe you would have been happier about 60 years ago in a time when they could lock you away because your neighbor said you might be a communist.

Maybe you would have been happier about 320 years ago in a time when they could burn you at the stake because your neighbor said you might be a witch. Salem is only 20 miles from Watertown.

Comment Re:Are you selling the brand? (Score 1) 113

No matter what you should switch for personal use (which is what I consider banking, health, etc) to a gmail/yahoo type email account that will always be there no matter what your hobbies or attention span are.

No. Then Google / Yahoo own the domain name. Bite the bullet and buy your own domain name that you use only for personal stuff like email. It is ok to use Google to provide the service (like Goodle Apps for your domain), but YOU own the domain. You can then change providers at will over the next 50 years without ever changing your email address again.

Comment Dumb design (Score 4, Insightful) 134

It was a dumb design from the beginning.

1) You don't haul cargo in the same vehicle as humans. Cargo doesn't need the super-expensive "last 1%" reliability that a human crew demands.

2) You don't put the vehicle next to the rocket. You put it on top, where ice can't hit it, and exploding booster rockets are survivable. The astronauts on the Challenger, as least some of them, survived the explosion and died on impact with the water. A small crew capsule perched on the top, with a parachute system, might, just might, have survived.

3) You don't need humans up there at all. The future, for a generation or two at least, is unmanned exploration of the solar system. Look at where virtually all the meaningful scientific knowledge has come from in the last 20 - 40 - 60 years: unmanned probes.

Comment Re:This annoys the hell out of me ... (Score 5, Insightful) 392

Yep. We need pedestrians to adapt to the cars, not the other way around. It's a ROAD. Try opening your fucking eyes...

I completely agree. In return, your car should stay off the pedestrian paths. Good luck getting anywhere more a few hundred feet in my city without being blocked by a crosswalk. Even with lights and pedestrian signals, you are still going to cross my pedestrian cross walk when I have the green walk light (your right and left turns) You need to go back to preschool and learn how to share.

Comment Re:Feature bloat vs. the KISS principle... (Score 2) 128

If I want to unlock the car, presumably I want to drive it. For that I'm going to need a key anyway, so...??

My car doesn't have a key, just a button to press. (Volkswagon, not a Ferrari or something else fancy). It just has a fob that needs to be in range for the "start" button to be enabled. This would be more convenient if my cell phone could be the fob, but only if it can't be hacked like this.

Comment Re:Wait until the boys get home from the war. (Score 1) 666

Check out "Starship Troopers" by Robert A. Heinlein. The scenario you describe is virtually identical to the political backdrop of that story. Good book. TERRIBLE movie. Not a bad idea for a democratic form of government. I just would like to skip the chaotic transition phase.

Comment Re:Bingo! (Score 2) 1017

A jump seat at the front and rear of every plane occupied by a uniformed marshal with a clearly visible assault rifle would stop pretty much all of this nonsense.

Wow. Really? Do these Marshalls have special magical unicorn tear bullets in their assault rifles that make it impossible for a bomb to off? They are looking for explosives on the kid.

All great ideas are controversial, or have been at one time.

Working...