Comment Re:nonsense (Score 1) 355
Comment Re:nonsense (Score 1) 355
Submission + - First full observable universe simulation
Comment Re:Windows 7: "I'm up here, boys!" (Score 1) 452
OK, so you're a geek guy who never had a girlfriend? Or you only had one and you haven't broken up yet? Or you just don't like the way that kind of remark can suddenly head off towards sexism when geeks are conversing? Or did you just not think the original was very, well, original? Or maybe you just like expressing disapproval?
Comment Re:Actually... (Score 1) 501
"""But if you look as far back as the dawn of civilization..."""
I'm still waiting for the dawn of civilization. Are we there yet?
Comment Re:future of perl? (Score 1) 415
"""I work with 4 other Perl programmers. Because we all follow a simple set of coding standards and design patterns, no one has any problems understanding anyone else's code."""
I'm a Python user myself, just because the language happens to fit better with my temperament and preconceptions, but I used Perl fairly extensively in the early days of the wild, wild web, and I do get a little tired of the users of one language knocking other languages unnecessarily.
In Iceland this week, a Python User Group member who has a large web site written in Perl asked me "Why should I rewrite my web site in Python?". I couldn't think of a single reason, as long as the site is doing what it needs to. Perl is a workhorse language, and will likely continue to be so.
I *do* think Python has advantages as a first programming language but, as Tassach observes, an experienced programmer will get the best out of whatever language they use by adopting disciplines that make up for its shortcomings. We sometimes jokingly refer to Perl as a "write-only" language, but that could also be construed as a compliment about its terseness. A good Perl programmer with a familiar toolkit at their fingertips can cut code at high speed, and the problem of understanding six months later what it does is eased by simple documentary comments.