This has been corroborated by Forbes writer Nicole Perlroth who, it seems, conducted her own investigation into Pfizer corruption in late 2008. http://bit.ly/eIHFiP

Yeah, I'm thinking the report is bogus. By now, it would be everywhere if it was genuine.

"With the Amazon attack, they are simply toooo big for us right now. Maybe at a later time we can try again with them." - http://on.mash.to/gIy5kV

I grabbed the content from CNN, so the credibility has to lie with them. There have been other sources confirming this, however, and the group has supposedly opened a new twitter account which has confirmed it.

It seems anonymous has posted a video explaining themselves on mediaite.com and it is interesting to say the least...

You may be right. But to resolve to sit quietly and just take it all out of fear isn't the solution.

"Thou shalt not cover things which thy government dislikes. Punishment: Guantanamo."

The fear of a government crackdown is probably the best possible excuse to continue what you are doing.

gawker has said, although unsubstantiated, that websites are being handed federal orders to stop chronicling the attacks. If true (which it very well may not be), I would be very curious to learn on what grounds the coverage is being ordered to stop.

I agree that there is a need for a private space industry, but it was still sad to see an organization that has as its prime directive the furtherance of science lose the ability to get to space to perform manned experiments.